Attributing rational thought processes to people consumed by drug addiction is illogical.
If the point of testing is to identify people in need of treatment, fine, but starving them, I am not willing to sign onto in the name of saving a buck....or eugenics, whichever is the motivating factor.
Why don't you drug test the recipients and cut the herd even more.
"In job training" and "searching for employment" will be the loopholes.
Utah spent $30,000 to drug test and saved $350,000. $350,000 - $30,000 = $320,000 less tax payer's money paid out.
Utah's welfare drug testing saved more than $350,000 in first year, officials say | Deseret News
Utah's law also doesn't disqualify people who test positive from receiving benefits. Instead, it requires them to enter substance abuse treatment.
Utah spent $30,000 to drug test and saved $350,000. $350,000 - $30,000 = $320,000 less tax payer's money paid out.
Utah's welfare drug testing saved more than $350,000 in first year, officials say | Deseret News
The law identifies those with drug issues early on in the process, and if they aren't willing to get help or meet the requirements, they shouldn't get benefits, Wilson said.
The next step, Wilson said, "is to find out why those 250 people would rather not get benefits and keep using drugs, and what we can do to maybe help them realize that is a poor choice."
Are food stamps ebt now days?
Why don't you drug test the recipients and cut the herd even more.
Community service.
I'm not so sure: $0 Food Stamps = Starvation.
If they have money to spend on drugs then I don't think they're really all that much in need of the food stamps we would be taking away from them.I'm not so sure: $0 Food Stamps = Starvation.