Because apparently it costs too much. We can't have them fund their own drug tests, now can we?Why don't you drug test the recipients and cut the herd even more.
Why don't you drug test the recipients and cut the herd even more.
Because apparently it costs too much. We can't have them fund their own drug tests, now can we?
"In job training" and "searching for employment" will be the loopholes.
They should. But they know then they'd be taking away lots of kids and the already ****ty foster care and child services programs would be overwhelmed even more and the kids would suffer.Why don't you drug test the recipients and cut the herd even more.
You mean it already isn't?"In job training" and "searching for employment" will be the loopholes.
How about we make sure people who get food stamps really, really need them and they are required to work.
If you want to summarily execute people who take drugs, just get it over with. No reason to starve them slowly.
Attributing rational thought processes to people consumed by drug addiction is illogical.
If the point of testing is to identify people in need of treatment, fine, but starving them, I am not willing to sign onto in the name of saving a buck....or eugenics, whichever is the motivating factor.