I'm looking for the least Trumpian, least authoritarian, most reasonably libertarian of the three. I want a sane immigration policy. I want fiscal responsibility. I don't want tariffs. I don't want militarism. I don't want a police state. I certainly don't want gun control, through either legislation or executive order. So a Trump endorsement would tend to be a fairly big negative in my view. I want someone who has the stones to tell Trump to **** off on those issues important to me.
And the Winner is????
+1
If a guy lies on his yard signs, what can you possibly expect if he gets to congress? Oh.... more of the same. Nevermind, carry on.
Where, exactly, is the lie?
Designed (i.e. using different font sizes) to mislead? Yes. Factually incorrect? No.
Intent to mislead == lie.
At least from a Christian perspective; which Todd proudly claims.
I'll buy that.
I think I'm just starting to see Rokita get the Mourdock treatment, with the rather ticky-tack stuff coming out (this sign, the memo, etc.), and I naturally want to push back against it.
Detractors gonna detract.
Haters gonna hate.
I place it firmly at the feet of those who didn't vote for Mourdock...and the Republicans for Donnelly group; those RINOs were flat out traitors.
I'm just pointing out things. I don't fit into either camp. The opinions expressed are not my own.
It isn't like this is anything new.I'll vote against Donnelly for whoever wins the primary. I hate the negative ads(mostly from Braun). It's sad that negative ads are todays politics.
I place it firmly at the feet of those who didn't vote for Mourdock...and the Republicans for Donnelly group; those RINOs were flat out traitors.
Negative ads are a paradox. Everyone says they hate them but the "experts" say they work.
The way these guys answer direct questions about their positions and philosophies, it's no wonder people have to rely on negative ads as a means to vet these people.