Of course, a man poses with dead citizens, and democrats choose him to head a position. Any questions about democrats intentions?
I would add "wilfully"Only to the deaf, dumb, and blind.
It was obviously anti gun zealots to get their man on the inside in a position to advance anti gun policy.He's really too light and single focused to run the agency, it covers more squares than guns. Add that to the baggage and you wonder who advised Joe to select him.
Same thing goes for those that pushed Biden into selecting Kamala Harris to advance their future agenda.Those are the names it would be good to have.
That’s one heck of a leap. I haven’t heard anything about him killing anybody. I don’t know if he even fired a shot. Simply being at Waco doesn’t confirm you accusations. He was a member of the ATF. He was assuredly direct to be there. Unless he was involved in the planning and implementation of that event, your argument doesn’t hold weight.
David Chipman = Dylan Roof?At BEST he's an accessory to mass murder of a church congregation.
I don't see him as being any different than dylan roof. Except that he was complicit in killing far more people.
David Chipman = Dylan Roof?
It’s believing stuff like this, that make people think some Trumpers (cause it’s ALWAYS the Trumpers) are completely detached from reality.
No one, here, is supporting Chipman for the ATF head. What I’m doing is trying to get people to dispense with their detached arguments as to why he isn’t the right guy. It’s bordering on bonkers.David Chipman = Good for the country?
It's believing stuff like this that makes people think most Bidenista's (because it's ALWAYS the Bidenista's) are completely detached from reality.
I may have misunderstood the intent of you comment (if I did, my apologies), but change a few words and it holds true for the the other side of the coin as well.
No one, here, is supporting Chipman for the ATF head. What I’m doing is trying to get people to dispense with their detached arguments as to why he isn’t the right guy. It’s bordering on bonkers.
He's been active in an anti-gun organization. He's spoken disparagingly (from what I understand) about those of us that care about our 2A rights. He has shown tacit approval (if not outright approval) for the methods used by Clinton's ATF and their raid on the Branch Davidians when he posed in front of smoldering dead U.S. citizens like some sick "trophy hunter". The man is despicable. What is bonkers is that anyone would show anything but disgust for such an individual in general, but especially on a gun forum such as this.No one, here, is supporting Chipman for the ATF head. What I’m doing is trying to get people to dispense with their detached arguments as to why he isn’t the right guy. It’s bordering on bonkers.
I must have missed the people singing his praises. An you’re upset that I’m unwilling to draw a kinship between Chipman and the guys actually dropping cans of Zyklon B, well you’re just gonna have to be mad.He's been active in an anti-gun organization. He's spoken disparagingly (from what I understand) about those of us that care about our 2A rights. He has shown tacit approval (if not outright approval) for the methods used by Clinton's ATF and their raid on the Branch Davidians when he posed in front of smoldering dead U.S. citizens like some sick "trophy hunter". The man is despicable. What is bonkers is that anyone would show anything but disgust for such an individual in general, but especially on a gun forum such as this.
He's been active in an anti-gun organization. He's spoken disparagingly (from what I understand) about those of us that care about our 2A rights. He has shown tacit approval (if not outright approval) for the methods used by Clinton's ATF and their raid on the Branch Davidians when he posed in front of smoldering dead U.S. citizens like some sick "trophy hunter". The man is despicable. What is bonkers is that anyone would show anything but disgust for such an individual in general, but especially on a gun forum such as this.
Yes, bonkers.Really?
Did I draw any kinship between Chipman and Nazis in what I posted? Better read again bro.I must have missed the people singing his praises. An you’re upset that I’m unwilling to draw a kinship between Chipman and the guys actually dropping cans of Zyklon B, well you’re just gonna have to be mad.
Nothing in that indicates the man is a mass murderer who should be in prison.This is the case Kut old buddy. We want you to be FULLY INFORMED this time.
You know, read the facts and positions before attempting to claim ignorance like last time.
It most certainly indicates that he should not be in a position of power over anyone, period, let alone be the head of the agency that will be in charge of the disarmament of the American populace if/when it comes to that (and make no mistake, that is the goal).Nothing in that indicates the man is a mass murderer who should be in prison.