Having owned both, I liked the grip on the PPS better, but the mag release was different than all my other pistols. Also, the mags were much more expensive with the PPS. I liked the PPS trigger better, more Glock like. Never have cared for the M&P trigger, and my Shield was no different. I tried to like the Shield, but the most I could muster for it was "meh." Many people like them, but it just didn't click for me.
I finally just went with a Glock 36, which isn't much bigger or heavier than either the Shield or PPS, and my favorite caliber to boot. (.45) Much more accessory/night sight availability as well, and it's the same platform as my full size guns, which are also Glocks.
I like my Shield. It is very reliable, recoil not bad for it's size
and easy to carry.
I also think they are priced right. I paid $398, but have heard the same dealer is getting $429 now, when he can get them.
I find myself asking the same question. I've fired a rental Shield 9mm, but no idea of the mileage. If/when I get a chance to test fire a PPS in comparison maybe the choice would be easier, but I have no idea where I would do that.
I own a 40 PPQ and REALLY enjoy it, and I actually like the paddle mag release on the trigger guard, so that wouldn't bother me. The price difference is nothing to laugh at though.
Haven't played with a PPS, but did play with a Shield. With the Apex trigger, its got a good feel. With the stock trigger, ick. I'd also carry safety off, that tiny frame mounted safety isn't going to be easy to deactivate under stress or left handed.
Own neither but have shot both. If I had to take one or the other, it would be a Shield. But if you want one or the other any time soon and don't want to pay bend-over prices, go with the PPS as they are MUCH more readily available (we've got two in-stock as I type this).
Wife gave up waiting on a shield. Just bought a PPS. I shot it last Monday and must say I really like it. Great trigger and feels really good in my hand. Never handled a shield but I think she made a good choice.
My Lady could not rack the Walther and opted for the Shield. I like it so much, if I happen upon one, I will purchase one for myself to have in those times when I would prefer to be a little less noticeable. I will say that I did like the feei of the Walther as well...
if your favorite cal is 45 ACP and you are looking PPS and M&P I would also look into a Springfield XDs single stack 45 ACP as an alternative as well. a little on pricey side but for a match grade barrel and multiple back straps and the kit that comes with it it is the best bang for your buck. Only down side is when they come into to your local gun shop they go right out. But if you are able to find one take it.
After much thought, I've decided to keep my SR9c and use it as a pocket gun. I carry at work (naughty-naughty) but I also usually wear cargo type pants with very large pockets. Looking at the sizes, there's really not a huge size and weight difference between the SR9c and the other two.
PPS gets my vote. I like the trigger better (as someone mentioned, it is more glock like)...the Shield's trigger is an improvement, but still nothing to write home about. I also like the mag release and accuracy of the PPS.
PPS also has 6, 7, and 8rd mags. To whoever it was who said the Shield holds one more, you're wrong.
Really depends on preference- triggers are fairly similar, widths and size are also. Do you like the may eject on the pps or the shield? I couldn't get used to the may eject on the walther ppq- went with a m&p instead. If pps or shield would have been available in my area might have considered both also. If you have access to both lucky you! Try shooting em and see which you like better!