That is what it appears to beBecause after they get the guns then they no longer have to fear implementing the rest of their authoritarian agenda.
Like your house? We're sorry, an endangered species was found on your property, it's now our house.
Like your job? We're sorry, but your employer isn't paying you enough money so we're forcing them to raise wages, I know you're going to be laid off but we don't care.
Like your children? We're sorry, they belong to the community and need raised with the values of society instilled in them.
Like your freedom? We're sorry, you're just too dangerous to be allowed to have internet access, we're shutting it off until you stop speaking negatively of the administration.
Because after they get the guns then they no longer have to fear implementing the rest of their authoritarian agenda.
Like your house? We're sorry, an endangered species was found on your property, it's now our house.
Like your job? We're sorry, but your employer isn't paying you enough money so we're forcing them to raise wages, I know you're going to be laid off but we don't care.
Like your children? We're sorry, they belong to the community and need raised with the values of society instilled in them.
Like your freedom? We're sorry, you're just too dangerous to be allowed to have internet access, we're shutting it off until you stop speaking negatively of the administration.
Because they think it'll work - that it'll reduce gun violence, violent fatalities, etc.. I think they're wrong, but they disagree.
I mean, surely some of you have spoken to a liberal, right? Just ask them. There's no need to attribute malicious intent when they're happy to explain what they're thinking.
Because they think it'll work - that it'll reduce gun violence, violent fatalities, etc.. I think they're wrong, but they disagree.
I mean, surely some of you have spoken to a liberal, right? Just ask them. There's no need to attribute malicious intent when they're happy to explain what they're thinking.
Because they think it'll work - that it'll reduce gun violence, violent fatalities, etc.. I think they're wrong, but they disagree.
I mean, surely some of you have spoken to a liberal, right? Just ask them. There's no need to attribute malicious intent when they're happy to explain what they're thinking.
Here you go. I probably would say more, but he pretty well covered it. People generally don't feel the need to prepare for what they don't intend to do, so when they prepare, I generally assume that they intend to follow through. Read up on Agenda 21. It isn't tin foil, it's an official UN plan with official UN documentation, and we have plenty who would do so domestically with or without the UN. Look at Britain where a formerly free people beg the government for what little freedom they still have. Look at the way every dictatorship in modern history has been immediately preceded by denying the soon to be subjugated people arms with which to defend themselves. Look at the first battle of our revolution which was sparked by British troops ON THEIR WAY TO CAPTURE GUNS AND AMMUNITION WHICH THREATENED THE IMPOSITION OF INCREASED RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM.
I would explain this to you the same way that I would explain to the girls that if a home invader wants to tie her down to the bed, it isn't out of fear that she will fall off. If anyone wants to deny you the capacity to resist, that is a pretty good indicator that he intends to give you a good reason to resist.
There's all kinds of liberal thinking. Little of which I can agree with.Because they think it'll work - that it'll reduce gun violence, violent fatalities, etc.. I think they're wrong, but they disagree.
I mean, surely some of you have spoken to a liberal, right? Just ask them. There's no need to attribute malicious intent when they're happy to explain what they're thinking.
I see 2 schools of thought in the whole right verses left paradigm:
One group sees freedom as the ability to do whatever they want, whenever they want, and to whoever they want with little or no consequences or repercussions. Also freedom to them is being free from any or all resposibility, and places that responsibility on government. They submit themselves fully to enslavement, and they like it so long as they get to have drugs, meals, entertainment, and whatever else is important to them.
Group 2 sees freedom as the ability and obligation to do what is right, moral, and responsible for their families, themselves, and towards society- independent of any oversight as it is theoretically not needed except in matters of maintaining order.
Just my observation in a nutshell...
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to trucker777 again.