Thank you. I will try the this thread again.Seek and you shall find…
Click next to the search box, choose “this thread”
View attachment 212697
Police chief said at Mondays presser Eli had a Glock. I linked that presser up above
Confusion is because there were several guns there.Ok, help me settle a work argument?
FIRST: the GOOD SAMARITAN shot 10 rounds striking the MASS MURDERER with 8 rounds At 40 yards? I have heard this on the news and a few web sights. true or false? If so hats off to the GS.
SECOND: we are having an argument on the GS’s weapon. I was told it was a Springfield hellcat and he was told it was a Glock. Have they said what weapon the GS used to defend the mall walkers?
thank you in advance. Maybe it was listed here as the hellcat but it is hard to search threads on INGO and at 60 plus pages I can’t find it.
I think the report is bad guy had 2 on him, and one in the bathroom.Confusion is because there were several guns there.
Bad guy had one I think.
Good guy obviously did.
And the first victim had one.
Jesus introduced a new covenant. Read what he said.If you believe that Christ was God manifested in the flesh all you have to look at is what the prince of peace did in the Old Testament and what He will do in judgement in Revelation. His time on earth in the flesh was for the specific reason you gave for that time for what He wanted and promised would be done. If you don’t believe Jesus was God manifested in the flesh then your reading a different Bible and have a different theology than mine.
^^^^^^^^ ThisNo they don't. You are presuming that they are saying what they are because they believe it. In a different situation, they would be very pleased to point out that a rule is not law.
There is no Truth in them. They claim for the moment what they believe helps their position.
I'm not a Biblical expert. But it's somewhere in my memory that "good samaritan" has a legal meaning that would apply here. For example, when I was in vet school we were told that if we assisted humans in a medical emergency we had some legal protection under "good samaritan" concept. That level of legal protection has likely declined in recent years, but perhaps you know if the concept has some legal background ?I am not going to accept theological lessons from those who have no respect for the Word and try to selfishly use it for their own purposes.
Speaking of the Word, for anyone thinking that Jesus would never do violence, they should read the second half of Revelation 19, then get back to us.
A cop friend told me today it was a Glock 43X. If that's actually true, then he at best had 1 round left. But he sure made them all count.Seek and you shall find…
Click next to the search box, choose “this thread”
View attachment 212697
Police chief said at Mondays presser Eli had a Glock. I linked that presser up above
Maybe. If he had a Shield Arms mag he at best had 6 rounds left.A cop friend told me today it was a Glock 43X. If that's actually true, then he at best had 1 round left. But he sure made them all count.
You are in territory I won't enter in trying to say what Jesus would endorse.Is Jesus A Pacifist? | Cold Case Christianity
Jesus was not a pacifist, even though He chose to passively submit His life to save those who trust in Him.coldcasechristianity.com
Was Jesus a pacifist? | GotQuestions.org
Was Jesus a pacifist? What does it mean that Jesus is the Prince of Peace? Does Jesus oppose all warfare at all times?www.gotquestions.org
Further more, he forgave only one of two crucified next to him, the one who basically accepted him as Lord and Savior. So, I’m not sure what that has to do with self defense.
And this admonition seems to suggest being fully armed is a good thing.
The Myth of a Non-Violent Jesus
Let us imagine, as people often do, that Jesus returns for a visit. Knowing Jesus as we do, we may envision him spending some time at a local bar. Given the wide variety of folks he liked to talk witwww.realclearreligion.org
That platform has been expanding wth every mass shooting we have to deal with.Ignorant clowns that for some reason have a platform to spread this garbage.
Depends on who your showing the mercy to. I mean technically you’d be showing the shooter mercyHad to pull out the Bible to go over the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Seems most of the people who are arguing against calling him that, only quote a certain amount. They say, see the Good Samaritan was good because they did nice things for the person, but that wasn't the point wasn't the physical acts that occurred, it was the mercy shown.
Which is more merciful, shooting a killer, or running away?
There are "good samaritan" laws in various places that mean different things. Usually, they have to do with immunity for a person who renders medical aid without payment, but could apply to other things as well. I don't see any statutory "good samaritan" law at issue here.I'm not a Biblical expert. But it's somewhere in my memory that "good samaritan" has a legal meaning that would apply here. For example, when I was in vet school we were told that if we assisted humans in a medical emergency we had some legal protection under "good samaritan" concept. That level of legal protection has likely declined in recent years, but perhaps you know if the concept has some legal background ?
This one video states 30 feet, haven’t found other confirmation yet.
Greenwood PD released a correction on the time, I’d expect if they got the distance wrong they’d issue a correction