Would the Surefire x200 or x300 be too large for a m&p 9c or even a Glock 19?
Depends on your definition. A Surefire will stick out a bit forward of the muzzle on a G19/23 but they will fit on the pistol and function fine.
Would the Surefire x200 or x300 be too large for a m&p 9c or even a Glock 19?
Yes and as far as I know the broken lights were on SWAT pistols which see considerably more use than others. I'm not knocking the TLR-1 lights, for the money they are a good quality light and light years better than the Insight M3.
No worries! I don't have an emotional attachment to such things (but since so many people do, you have to be careful).
I was curious because lightweight .40s beat the crap out of things like the operator, lights, etc. It's impressive that the SureFire lights lights can tolerate that indefinitely even though they are SureFire!
The Streamlight lights can take some pretty good impacts, but if they're going to fail, recoil from a .40 is going to make it happen over time. I would not expect them to be as prone to failure when mounted on a 9mm or .45, but you never know.
I have replaced the TLR-1s on my M&P 9 twice. The first time it failed it had about 4k rds under its belt. The second time it was barely over 1k. And now now the standard TLR-1 is using the circuitry as the 1s but with out the strobe function. I am not sure switching the the TLR-1 to the new circuitry is a good thing.
Wether or not it's the streamlight or Surefire, if you had a weapon light, is it better to keep it on your gun,(using it on your EDC) or to take it on and off? (using it on your night stand gun)
I'm just curios if doing one of those 2 will increase or decrease the life of the light.