Concerned Citizen
Sharpshooter
So what I am reading is that IC clearly states that the Officer must be able to articulate why he felt the person was potentially dangerous and why he felt it necessary to disarm said person. However, the Officers say they all know the judge and that they can get away with it so rights be damned they will do as they please. Oh, and any passive, verbal resistance will be met with brute force. Ok, got it.
That's not what I'm hearing. There is a difference between TEMPORARILY disarming a person during a traffic stop, and CONFISCATING a firearm and not returning it.
LEO's have the authority to TEMPORARILY disarm you simply for their own safety without having a reason to believe that you are a dangerous person. If they CONFISCATE your firearm & don't give it back, THEN they have to provide a written report and show their reasoning for believing you to be a dangerous person.