If you have read the manifesto and believe that it came from the perpetrator then this would not be the case. At least not in this incident.
He specifically states that his ideology has'nt changed in several years and his opinions on automation, immigration and the rest predate Trump. Says he is including this because he knows some people and the media will call him a white supremacist anyway and blame Trump for his rhetoric which he states is not the case.
I have read the manifesto but I will not give the author the justification that he so desperately craves. There is absolutely never a justification as I have previously posted.
I read the manifesto too. And as you mentioned he said his ideology hasn't changed in years. Now consider this, the most powerful man on the planet gave voice to his ideology. One can argue, from the shooters perspective, even justified it. No longer did he need wonder if he was wrong, or if his ideology was crackpot, he had the POTUS spouting off the same stuff. You can't a better endorsement than that.
Movies, music, games etc. are a small part of the big picture. Add to that years of failed libtard social policies and we're reaping what we've sown.
They all work to desensitize our culture and make us more callous , less caring people.
I read the manifesto too. And as you mentioned he said his ideology hasn't changed in years. Now consider this, the most powerful man on the planet gave voice to his ideology. One can argue, from the shooters perspective, even justified it. No longer did he need wonder if he was wrong, or if his ideology was crackpot, he had the POTUS spouting off the same stuff. You can't a better endorsement than that.
It's equally likely it was the pressure being applied from the open borders types that placed that last straw on the camels back, in his mind he had to act before it was too late.
It's just depends on what prism you view the information from.
Or he’s a homicidal maniac and if it wasn’t this, it would have been something else. Any reason, or no reason at all.
I'm not buying into that. The Middle East is full of "homicidal" maniacs, but their homicidal tendencies are almost solely based on ideology. Why can't that apply elsewhere?
I dont think kids should have access to these shooting and killing video games. Ive said this before, so I dont know if this boy (a man doesn't kill innocent people) even played them.
Sadly parents wont be parents and control what content their kids have access to so no matter what laws are passed the kids will still get them. The only way to curb it would be to start fining or jailing parents for giving their young kids access to that smut. Young kids do not need to be playing first person shooter games period. I dont care who that upsets or who disagrees with me. There is a difference between liking and shooting guns vs shooting and killing people as an objective in a game. These games desensitize children to reality at their most critical developmental stages.
Ive seen people who can handle it and ive seen people who have been shaped by that kind of violent video game.
Not everyone can rationalize things the same way. We have serious mental health issues in this country and these video games are basically terrorists training manuals for the insane and delinquents.
I hear people say, we didnt have school shooters and mass shooters all the time back when I grew up. Yeah thats because we had atari and then mario brothers.
I'm not buying into that. The Middle East is full of "homicidal" maniacs, but their homicidal tendencies are almost solely based on ideology. Why can't that apply elsewhere?
Often these active shooters are known problems in their various communities. Be it in their family, local neighborhood, online social media or even law enforcement.
Wonder if "see something, say something" happened or not in this case?
Did it fail, as it has in some others?
You can argue that the President's rhetoric played a part in pushing this individual over the edge except he specifically states that Trump's rhetoric had nothing to do with it. You are implying that it did without really knowing.I read the manifesto too. And as you mentioned he said his ideology hasn't changed in years. Now consider this, the most powerful man on the planet gave voice to his ideology. One can argue, from the shooters perspective, even justified it. No longer did he need wonder if he was wrong, or if his ideology was crackpot, he had the POTUS spouting off the same stuff. You can't a better endorsement than that.
**** the nut job shooter, I pray he burns in hell for eternity. He is not worthy of any forgiveness, divine or otherwise!
However, with Trump there's a pretty seamless connection from his rhetoric to action.