I have nothing against bigger women. However I HATE leggings. IMHO if you are going to wear leggings, your top should still be something you would wear even if you didn't have the leggings on to begin with.
Did I say I hate leggings?
Ride a horse? Skin tight pants and leggings as far as the eye can see.
A**less chaps for horses. Now I've seen everythingSpeaking of horses and pants I managed to find some pics of RnR wearing tight pants.
Not sure if I can post those on INGO since her big butt is showing.
I have nothing against bigger women. However I HATE leggings. IMHO if you are going to wear leggings, your top should still be something you would wear even if you didn't have the leggings on to begin with.
Did I say I hate leggings?
.....Uhhhh......you look'n at'a wrong kind'a chics......at can pull'em off,dude.....
go work on yer well........
Considering a few of his posts... he's a sick puppy too.IGW just wants to see the world burn.
Ride a horse? Skin tight pants and leggings as far as the eye can see.
The rule of thumb is that if leggings/tights are skin tight, they should be worn with a top long enough to cover the hip/butt area. BUT many women do not follow this rule and wear waist-length tops, and then what is seen cannot be unseen. I've seen women my size (>200 lbs) wear short tops with what seem to be no more than colored pantyhose. I'm sure they think they're sexy, but take it from me, sistergirl, nobody wants to see that.
Looking at some of those pics, I have new-found respect for the garment industry's ability to make tights with that kind of tensile strength.
Haven't you noticed some have pushed the XL limits past the laws of physics?There ought to be a law... No spandex over size XL. Just sayin...
There ought to be a law... No spandex over size XL. Just sayin...
They actually don't make it past (L) they just keep cramming more in there.
I don't want to know how you know that