- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
They aren't definitive in themselves, but rather a subjective standard based upon metrics of past statement and/or behaviors and circumstances.
Though its a good bet whenever they state an extreme opinion (ie: someone or everyone has an unconditional right to do something or anything OR nobody or only a few people have an unconditional right to do something or anything) its generally a good bet that they meet the criteria.
So then my belief that no one who is fit to be roaming free should be denied his or her Second Amendment rights and those who cannot be trusted with a full set of rights should not roam free would fit me into one or both of those categories?