Did world war 3 just start?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,073
    149
    Indiana
    DAMASCUS, (BM) – Russian bombers destroyed Turkish tanks, 18 MLRS installations and about 50 armored personnel carriers, learned BulgarianMilitary.com citing news agency Aviapro publication.
    https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2020/...urkish-armored-vehicles-and-weapons-in-syria/

    Did Turkey a member of NATO since 1952 void their NATO membership by crossing borders without approval,or did they have approval?


    Erdogan’s violation of the agreements with Moscow resulted in huge losses for Turkey in Syria. Since the beginning of last week, Turkish troops and pro-Turkish terrorists have lost almost a hundred units of armored vehicles illegally transported to Syria, and it’s not Syria, but Russian military aviation that is crushing the enemy.
    According to the arguments of local and foreign news agencies, today Turkey has lost at least 23 tanks in Syria (including 4 Leopard tanks – approx. Ed.), About 50 armored personnel carriers and armored vehicles, 18 MLRS installations, more than 20 military trucks and 2 warehouses with weapons and ammunition
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    DAMASCUS, (BM) – Russian bombers destroyed Turkish tanks, 18 MLRS installations and about 50 armored personnel carriers, learned BulgarianMilitary.com citing news agency Aviapro publication.
    https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2020/...urkish-armored-vehicles-and-weapons-in-syria/

    Did Turkey a member of NATO since 1952 void their NATO membership by crossing borders without approval,or did they have approval?


    Erdogan’s violation of the agreements with Moscow resulted in huge losses for Turkey in Syria. Since the beginning of last week, Turkish troops and pro-Turkish terrorists have lost almost a hundred units of armored vehicles illegally transported to Syria, and it’s not Syria, but Russian military aviation that is crushing the enemy.
    According to the arguments of local and foreign news agencies, today Turkey has lost at least 23 tanks in Syria (including 4 Leopard tanks – approx. Ed.), About 50 armored personnel carriers and armored vehicles, 18 MLRS installations, more than 20 military trucks and 2 warehouses with weapons and ammunition

    Putin once again showing why he's easily the smartest, most proactive, head of state of his time. Encourage a rift between NATO/US and Turkey, and wipe the floor with the Turks who thought they were friendly with Russia.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Putin once again showing why he's easily the smartest, most proactive, head of state of his time. Encourage a rift between NATO/US and Turkey, and wipe the floor with the Turks who thought they were friendly with Russia.

    So, was it brilliant to extricate US troops and let the untrustworthy ally and the evil genius go at it? Asking for a friend

    Turkey gets a heaping helping of 'be careful what you wish for'. What's not to like?
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Creative attrition of inventory that will require replenishment. Putin's always been an opportunist.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    26,199
    149
    The Turks purchase of the Russian made S-400 missile system might be compromised.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    So, was it brilliant to extricate US troops and let the untrustworthy ally and the evil genius go at it? Asking for a friend

    Turkey gets a heaping helping of 'be careful what you wish for'. What's not to like?

    More like dumb luck. The ultimate goal was desirable, the way we got around to doing it (leaving the Kurds) not so much.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    My understanding is that only forces deployed (without invitation) beyond Turkey's borders are under attack, so Article 5 is not triggered. Perhaps Erdogan would be wise to muse upon what if things do escalate to that point, but you've alienated the US and have to rely on the Europeans

    I expect Turkey to back away from the brink, but one can never be sure cooler heads will prevail
     

    Dead Duck

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    53   0   0
    Apr 1, 2011
    14,062
    113
    .
    Just some teasing going on....

    E4aAhSY.jpg



    https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-canadian-jets-intercept-russian-planes-alaska-video-photos
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    At least one report referred to the US/Canadian intercept of the Russian "jet."

    That aggravates me as much as the AK-15/AR-47 crap.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    A turbo prop is a type of jet engine. :dunno:

    ?

    In a jet, the combustion of the gases provide the thrust. In a turboprop, the prop provides the thrust.

    I haven't looked at the exact differences in a long time, so my memory may be deserting me, but I don't think it accurate to say a turboprop engine is a jet engine - at least not in the context of flight.
     

    churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    ?

    In a jet, the combustion of the gases provide the thrust. In a turboprop, the prop provides the thrust.

    I haven't looked at the exact differences in a long time, so my memory may be deserting me, but I don't think it accurate to say a turboprop engine is a jet engine - at least not in the context of flight.

    The engine is basically a turbine jet based design.
     
    Top Bottom