But the text doesn't say that. I copied the actual text from the 4473 and listed it before I speculated on how it might change. It absolutely says:I don't think a case can be made that someone is addicted to anything based on one instance of use. I wholeheartedly agree that the left will never stop coming for our RKBA. My point was that if MJ was legalized like alcohol it would be dropped from the controlled substance list altogether. Alcohol is a drug but it isn't one of the scheduled narcotics.
"Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?"
Alcohol is a depressant, and an OMVI would make you an 'unlawful user' and that is necessary and sufficient - it is either/or as far as the 'addicted to'
Arguably, an OMVI would also make you an 'unlawful user' of marijuana even if it were legalized
Addiction is established by exhibiting tolerance and withdrawal