Wasn't Chicago already forced to allow carry of firearms outside the home?this is huge. Bigger than 'huge', whatever that would be.
for the Federal Court of D.C.
Chicago is next stop for this issue, bet your bottom dollar.
Wasn't Chicago already forced to allow carry of firearms outside the home?
So can you carry now?
So can you carry now?
Best you do so with a copy of the opinion in your pocket, but it appears so.
Wouldn't want to try it till you hear from the popo and the local government as to what their response will be. Not worth getting perforated.
Gun control has long roots in the American South where D.C. is.
However, it wasn't just during Jim Crow that gun laws where all the rage. The D.C. gun ban was passed in 1976. Even Chicago is not as hostile to guns as D.C.
Yes. As rockhopper noted. However, as rockhopper also noted, Chicago hasn't only been 'dragging their feet', Emanual and his cronies have been looking for EVERY possible way NOT to issue licenses. The Palmer decision addresses this specific issue.Wasn't Chicago already forced to allow carry of firearms outside the home?