Here's what I was referring to.I have not seen that.
The disease has a recovery rate, without meds, exceeding 98%.
There is a LOT of anecdotal evidence that ivermectin does something. Certainly more positive anecdotal evidence than negative. But people getting better is the natural order of this disease so it is very difficult to prove that someone who took ivermectin was improved/cured by it.
My sister and brother-in-law both took it starting ivermectin the very day they were diagnosed. They were following the FLCCC protocols. Still took them 2 weeks to get over Covid.
I have actually read 22 individual scientific studies on Ivermectin published in various medical journals. Not just the summary. The actual studies. Most are pretty sketchy. None used double blind/placebo, most were retrospective, most were very small sample sizes.Here's what I was referring to.
https://rumble.com/vj1sm5-ivory-hecker-media-conceals-and-censors-potential-covid-treatments.html
The Doc referred to in the video testified before the Senate. Most social media blocked it. So why isn't ivermectin used early on a wide basis? Now the MSM is throwing up warnings about farm store ivermectin (which they should) and still disregarding it's usefulness.I have actually read 22 individual scientific studies on Ivermectin published in various medical journals. Not just the summary. The actual studies. Most are pretty sketchy. None used double blind/placebo, most were retrospective, most were very small sample sizes.
There is a lot of misinformation about ivermectin. There is some very good information about ivermectin. There are some doctors who are totally convinced it works.
Meta analysis by Dr Tess Lauri shows it is generally effective, roughly 84% of the time if administered EARLY in the disease. There is a group pushing for Ivermectin to be used, it is the FLCCC and the head of that group testified in the US Senate. I do not dismiss it, I think it has huge potential if used early in the disease, as the meta-data seems to show. But in the case of the OP in this thread, it would likely be totally ineffective. And the media sources that are hyping it are not particularly credible, nor are the government sources that are trashing it.
Why? Because he can't prove it works. He says it works. He is very convinced it works. His testimony was very convincing. But facts matter.The Doc referred to in the video testified before the Senate. Most social media blocked it. So why isn't ivermectin used early on a wide basis? Now the MSM is throwing up warnings about farm store ivermectin (which they should) and still disregarding it's usefulness.
There is no big money to be made with ivermectin is the correct answer.Why? Because he can't prove it works. He says it works. He is very convinced it works. His testimony was very convincing. But facts matter.
If it really works then why, in South America, India and the Philippines didn't it work?
Many of the believer news sources credited ivermectin as effective when the actual cases started dropping BEFORE ivermectin was distributed. So again, facts matter.
There is some evidence it might work, in early stage. Let's see a real study. U of Minn and Oxford are both doing real studies. I have issues with the Oxford study, it could be better. We have no results (yet) from either.
Why would Peru, Bolivia, South Africa, India or the Philippines care about a company like Moderna if they could get a cheap drug.There is no big money to be made with ivermectin is the correct answer.
That was somewhat expected. The people with the vaccine hve little to no symptoms but are still carriers. The vaccine was never meant to stop transmission.The vaccinated appear to become super spreaders now...
They should use the same standards for the current 3 vaccines when speaking about the Ivermectin and such.Why? Because he can't prove it works. He says it works. He is very convinced it works. His testimony was very convincing. But facts matter.
Back to the original intent...any update for your friend, @Super Bee? Saw yesterday's, and figured that today sometime you would talk to the wife.
Yes, saw the every other day and thought yesterday was the “off” day. Hope all goes well.I try to only bother her every other day, she has a lot going on. Not only with her husband, they have two little girls as well.
If I hear anything today, I will post it. Thank you everyone for your concern.
Yes, saw the every other day and thought yesterday was the “off” day. Hope all goes well.
You may have missed my post 156-158 I made last evening. That is the latest I have as I have not spoken with her this morning.
Thank you for asking. It is nice to see how many people care.
Like the people who swear that Ivermectin works?What makes me scratch my head is the people who dutifully continue to believe the boy who has repeatedly cried "Wolf!"
You know how we gun folks get up in arms (sometimes almost literally) when other people want to ban ARs / semi-auto rifles because think of the children? And we point to the actual statistics that show that ARs / semi-auto rifles are used in almost statistically zero murders (it's higher than that, but this is a broad brush picture)?I know one person that died of Covid-19 and they were vaccinated.
"antibody-dependent enhancement" caused by Covid-19 vaccines is to blame. Yet they will never tell you the truth they probably have it locked down as national security so no one can actually tell the truth without going to prison. Like everything else the government does not want the citizens to find out goes under national security.
Very interested in your friends situation. While personally not a big fan of thread hijack I do appreciate that folks come to check on the OP and engage in banter similar to if we were actually waiting in the waiting room at the hospital...