-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Coronavirus II
- Thread starter churchmouse
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
I have seen the light now. It could still be a train, but that’s solid logic.
I think it’s important from the aspect that many of us might already have immunity and therefore be about normal activity. Only “the vulnerables” shelter in place.
Gotcha, thanks for clarifying.
MSM strikes again.
Point of clarification: we don't know that it is more contagious or more fatal than seasonal flu. We are assuming that, based on woefully inadequate data regarding infection rate.
We don't (yet) have a vaccine - though several are in process. We don't have treatments that have completed the three-phase clinical process - though, again, there are several in process.
Not sure if sarcasm, or...?
The reality of virulence and fatality is likely somewhere between those two extremes. We are determining public policy based on assuming where we are on the spectrum between the two. The prudence and acceptability of that public policy depends on where we actually are on that spectrum.
If you actually read the guidelines you will see that the implications put forth in this thread such as above are far less reasonable than reality.
...but there is a pandemic which causes death in disproportionately high numbers in the SS receiving population and spreads more easily where hygiene is less prioritized.
Don't say I'm not a "silver lining" kind of guy.
Our good doc posted recently that in over 40 studies since 1976 they have found 36,000- 57,000 die, per million, for each 1% of unemployment increase. That is a huge number that makes the current C-19 projection look puny. No you will not see it in overrun ICU's but these deaths are just as real as any coronavirus death. I am sorry you know someone that is fighting C-19 and I will pray for them and you.
Really? The "if it saves one life" argument is the same no matter what it is applied to...
Reality to accomplish what? 100% prevention was never the goal and is not possible in any event.
Why do people get hung up on the preventative measures not being perfect? That's a "no **** Sherlock" observation.
hoosierdoc
Freed prisoner
mortality higher in areas where fewer people are tested. go figure.
indiana is absolutely flat on new cases. so is the US. the world has been flat for a week.
COVID-19 - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
indiana is absolutely flat on new cases. so is the US. the world has been flat for a week.
COVID-19 - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
You mean to tell me that the mortality rates are higher where they test fewer people and primarily test people with significant symptoms?
https://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-other-2020-20S-MS-234.pdf
Ind. Sup. Ct. refuses to step in regarding prisoners and COVID risk.
Long story short, not their place and other entities already have the authority to address these issues.
Ind. Sup. Ct. refuses to step in regarding prisoners and COVID risk.
Long story short, not their place and other entities already have the authority to address these issues.
Not unless you want to be blinder than Stevie Wonder in a cave.
...Costco has great pricing on 1.75 L booze if you didn’t already know. In order to save money, though, I’ve broken out the “Doomsday Bank Account” and have been consuming it. Id forgotten how bland Jim Beam was.
I haven't had to break into the doomsday account yet, or the doomsday liquor stash.
On the good doctor's orders that higher alcohol content is better, I'm sticking with this for right now...
Above the magic 65% alcohol number, it's like Purell for your insides.
That had nothing to do with preventive measures at all. The subject was the reality of what the guidelines actually say regarding diagnosing COVID-19 as the cause of death. The real guidelines are much more reasonable than some of the conjecture put forth here.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/08/funeral-birthday-party-hugs-covid-19/
Chiraqi made the news on a CDC study from FEB on how a funeral and bday party got everyone in the family sick and caused at least 3 c-virus deaths so far. All because an out of town family member who was sick, coughing, came to the events!
Chiraqi made the news on a CDC study from FEB on how a funeral and bday party got everyone in the family sick and caused at least 3 c-virus deaths so far. All because an out of town family member who was sick, coughing, came to the events!
Flat on "new" cases. Doc - are you using "new" as in "new infections" or "newly discovered." There are assumptions to both that deserve to be explicit. One of the problems is what kind of "new" case is it - one that is admitted to the hospital for severe respiratory problems or one that is the result of contact tracing.
While "new" cases are flattening (whichever definition you want to use) the deaths are increasing. Sure there will be a lag of - what 5 to 10 days? - between diagnosis and resolution of a patient, but if the "new" cases only reflect what we're finding by community spread, then it kinda doesn't matter. The number of "new" cases doesn't actually reflect the spread.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/08/funeral-birthday-party-hugs-covid-19/
Chiraqi made the news on a CDC study from FEB on how a funeral and bday party got everyone in the family sick and caused at least 3 c-virus deaths so far. All because an out of town family member who was sick, coughing, came to the events!
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes?
For the life of me, I could not figure out why the former president of France was involved, and why you spelled his name wrong...
Sorry for the confusion. As for the guidelines....I don't so much care whether they "inflate" the numbers to some extent as long as they are uniform. Trends are what I am interested rather than raw numbers.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/08/funeral-birthday-party-hugs-covid-19/
Chiraqi made the news on a CDC study from FEB on how a funeral and bday party got everyone in the family sick and caused at least 3 c-virus deaths so far. All because an out of town family member who was sick, coughing, came to the events!
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes?
For the life of me, I could not figure out why the former president of France was involved, and why you spelled his name wrong...
They should have had a crystal ball? This was in February.
- Status
