So if I said the mortality rate is 50%, would you dispute that number? 40%? 30%? 20%, 10%? What about 1%, .9, .8....1%? What lower and upper bounds would you accept?
I think there is enough data to narrow it.
I think there is enough data to narrow it.
Given the variability involved in the confidence interval, it is, for all practical purposes, the same as saying that we have no clue what the mortality rate is. We know that it is non-zero. We know that it has an upper bound, based on testing the most at-risk/most symptomatic. We more or less don't know anything between those two limits.