California Seizes Guns as Owners Lose Right to Bear Arms - Bloomberg
They admit that registering guns made it easier!!
They admit that registering guns made it easier!!
Merely being in a database of registered gun owners and having a “disqualifying event,” such as a felony conviction or restraining order, isn’t sufficient evidence for a search warrant, Marsh said March 5 during raids in San Bernardino County. So the agents often must talk their way into a residence to look for weapons, he said.
That's because you're not a "Prohibited Person" as determined by the state.Doesn't sound like tyranny to me, and I'm not seeing a reason to get worked up over it.
Doesn't sound like tyranny to me, and I'm not seeing a reason to get worked up over it.
Sooo...we're against taking firearms away from mentally unstable people? Do you really want no mechanism in place to remove firearms from someone who's violently mentally ill BEFORE the tragedy happens?
Also, did you notice this in the article:
Doesn't sound like tyranny to me, and I'm not seeing a reason to get worked up over it.
I know someone who has a history of bipolar disorder. It's well-controlled, but because of the history, she had to go to a shrink to get a letter approving her for her LTCH. The one she was seeing was anti-gun, and thus, had she gotten a whiff that the young lady was seeking her license or afterward, had gotten it, there would have been a letter to the state telling them not to issue. She ended up seeking out and finding a different, pro-2A psychiatrist to write the letter, and was issued her license. No issues since, and she carries daily.
I am against taking guns away from any private citizen. If the citizen is so dangerous as to not be safe around guns, take the citizen away, under due process, to an asylum or a prison. I'm sure it's much easier to take things away from people than to take people away from things.... but if the person is so much of a risk, it shouldn't be too hard to prove it, even if the bar is set significantly high enough to avoid infringements of good peoples' rights.
Blessings,
Bill
I know someone who has a history of bipolar disorder. It's well-controlled, but because of the history, she had to go to a shrink to get a letter approving her for her LTCH. The one she was seeing was anti-gun, and thus, had she gotten a whiff that the young lady was seeking her license or afterward, had gotten it, there would have been a letter to the state telling them not to issue. She ended up seeking out and finding a different, pro-2A psychiatrist to write the letter, and was issued her license. No issues since, and she carries daily.
I am against taking guns away from any private citizen. If the citizen is so dangerous as to not be safe around guns, take the citizen away, under due process, to an asylum or a prison. I'm sure it's much easier to take things away from people than to take people away from things.... but if the person is so much of a risk, it shouldn't be too hard to prove it, even if the bar is set significantly high enough to avoid infringements of good peoples' rights.
Blessings,
Bill
Sooo...we're against taking firearms away from mentally unstable people? Do you really want no mechanism in place to remove firearms from someone who's violently mentally ill BEFORE the tragedy happens?
Also, did you notice this in the article:
Doesn't sound like tyranny to me, and I'm not seeing a reason to get worked up over it.
Sooo...we're against taking firearms away from mentally unstable people?
Doesn't sound like tyranny to me, and I'm not seeing a reason to get worked up over it.
I know someone who has a history of bipolar disorder. It's well-controlled, but because of the history, she had to go to a shrink to get a letter approving her for her LTCH. The one she was seeing was anti-gun, and thus, had she gotten a whiff that the young lady was seeking her license or afterward, had gotten it, there would have been a letter to the state telling them not to issue. She ended up seeking out and finding a different, pro-2A psychiatrist to write the letter, and was issued her license. No issues since, and she carries daily.
I am against taking guns away from any private citizen. If the citizen is so dangerous as to not be safe around guns, take the citizen away, under due process, to an asylum or a prison. I'm sure it's much easier to take things away from people than to take people away from things.... but if the person is so much of a risk, it shouldn't be too hard to prove it, even if the bar is set significantly high enough to avoid infringements of good peoples' rights.
Blessings,
Bill