Colorado Supreme Court Disqualifies Trump on the 2024 ballot

[march19]

I'm

An example of the dunning-kruger: "an amateur chess player overestimates their performance in the upcoming chess tournament compared to their competent counterparts."

Not overestimating anything, I know I'm a person who can't have all the knowledge of a subject but I am willing to share my perspectives to learn more. Arguing leads nowhere if both parties aren't acting in good faith

 

[Ingomike]

An example of the dunning-kruger: "an amateur chess player overestimates their performance in the upcoming chess tournament compared to their competent counterparts."

My point proven…

 

[KG1]

I counter your actual contextual argument based on Constitutional documentation with my philosophy.

 

[march19]

How? I'm not acting like I'm overestimating myself because I'm not coming into this thinking I'm more competent than anyone. Just because I share ideas doesn't mean I think I'm more competent than any old hoodad

My point proven…

 

[march19]

I counter your actual contextual argument based on Constitutional documentation with my philosophy.

YES! THERE WE GO! That's a respectable statement

 

[march19]

I counter your actual contextual argument based on Constitutional documentation with my phphilosophy.

I say this genuinely, thank you for being respectful KG1. It actually means a lot in a disagreement especially politically lol

 

[red_zr24x4]

My truth is “the” truth…

It honestly cracks me up to even read that. It is so detached from reality.

And rampant around here with the TDS crowd

 

[KG1]

I say this genuinely, thank you for being respectful KG1. It actually means a lot in a disagreement especially politically lol

Well don't get me wrong. Not trying to be disrespectful in saying this but I think that counter is an attempt to avoid the other because of an admitted lack of knowledge. Just being honest here.

 

[actaeon277]

I counter your actual contextual argument based on Constitutional documentation with my philosophy.

Philosophy is the talk on a cereal box
Religion is the smile on a dog
I'm not aware of too many things
I know what I know, if you know what I mean, do doo yeah

 

[printcraft]

How? I'm not acting like I'm overestimating myself because I'm not coming into this thinking I'm more competent than anyone. Just because I share ideas doesn't mean I think I'm more competent than any old hoodad

Is that anything like a hootenanny?

 

[actaeon277]

Is that anything like a hootenanny?

Is that the auntie of a hooter?

 

[actaeon277]

Or the nanny?

 

[printcraft]

Is that the auntie of a hooter?

I think you are thinking of a hoedown. (different meaning in or out of the hood)

 

[smokingman]

....lets tack a whack at steering this ship back on course.

US supreme court to hear appeal of Colorado ruling removing Trump from state ballot

Colorado ruling said Trump should be removed under 14th amendment to US constitution for inciting an insurrection

www.theguardian.com

 

[printcraft]

....lets tack a whack at steering this ship back on course.

 

[KG1]

I think you are thinking of a hoedown. (different meaning in or out of the hood)

A hootiehoedownnanny.

 

[chipbennett]

Plus, that's not very civil to attempt to insult me. Truth without kindness is only brutality

Since I have no problem if grown adults choose to partake of marijuana, absolutely zero insult was intended with my statement. I just find your attempt to turn a discussion of constitutional matters into some form of existentialism to be pointless.

 

[chipbennett]

I'm

Not overestimating anything, I know I'm a person who can't have all the knowledge of a subject but I am willing to share my perspectives to learn more. Arguing leads nowhere if both parties aren't acting in good faith

If you want to understand the philosophical reasoning for our founding documents, I'd recommend perusing The Federalist Papers.

 

[Sigblitz]

Eh, federal elections should be in the power of those who vote in them. Issues with constitutional rights and states rights be damned lol. Either way it doesn't matter, the people getting elected aren't reps of the people, even ones who directly voted for them. So imo it's all to the wolves anyway

Let's imagine on an extreme that one state has 80% of the population and all voted for the same candidate. They would be choosing the president for the other 49 states.
In the real world, each state has a voice in who they want elected.
Arbitrary isn't it. I can't see how you wouldn't like it.

 

[Sigblitz]

.

All caught up now.