Can Someone Check This Math, Please?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Wabatuckian

    Smith-Sights.com
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 9, 2008
    3,097
    83
    Wabash
    Hello,

    Can someone check this math,please? Before I go plugging it into a spreadsheet? It's a .22LR handload.

    Code:
    Impact  = 0.517490s
    
    Shot start = 0.060320s
    
    T(bullet unadjusted) = 0.45717s
    
    M = 1133fps (75 deg F)
    
    D = 150ft
    
    T(bullet) = T(total) - T(sound)
    
    T(sound) = 150ft/1133s = 0.13239s
    
    T(bullet) = 0.45717s - 0.13239s
    
    T(bullet) = 0.32478s
    
    V(bullet) = d/T(bullet) = 150ft/0.32478s = 461.85fps(avg)
    
    43.5fps avg loss with CCI bullet, avg of muzzle velocity and velocity at 150ft
    
    MV = 505.35fps

    My next purchase was going to be a chronograph, then I got laid off thanks to Indiana deciding folks didn't need as much health care as they'd been getting. 'Nuther subject though.

    Any help?

    Thanks!

    Josh
     

    Wabatuckian

    Smith-Sights.com
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 9, 2008
    3,097
    83
    Wabash
    Hello,

    Came from the website. Averaged the MV and 50yd velocity, and subtracted that number from the MV.

    I think it's sound, but that is one area I'm just not sure about.

    Thanks,

    Josh
     

    mhs

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    May 25, 2009
    131
    18
    Hello,

    Came from the website. Averaged the MV and 50yd velocity, and subtracted that number from the MV.

    I think it's sound, but that is one area I'm just not sure about.

    Thanks,

    Josh

    I'm pretty sure the loss in velocity isn't linear, so you can't use a simple average. I have no idea how to calculate it correctly, and I also have no idea if the error would amount to anything significant.

    Have you tried other distances to see how your calculated mv compares? If you used half the published 50 yard drop with 25 yard times, and got similar calculated mv, that would imply that the error is small.
     

    Wabatuckian

    Smith-Sights.com
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 9, 2008
    3,097
    83
    Wabash
    I'm pretty sure the loss in velocity isn't linear, so you can't use a simple average. I have no idea how to calculate it correctly, and I also have no idea if the error would amount to anything significant.

    Have you tried other distances to see how your calculated mv compares? If you used half the published 50 yard drop with 25 yard times, and got similar calculated mv, that would imply that the error is small.

    Hello,

    I'm going to set up a control at 100yds for this. At 50 yards, a full supersonic round was just too fast for proper analysis.

    I'm pretty sure it's not linear too - and the further the range, the more error will be introduced.

    I'm sure the true number could be calculated out using ballistic coefficient vs air density, but I have no idea how to do that.

    Since the .22LR shows no appreciable drop to 50 yards, but begins to fall off quite a bit thereafter, it would seem the error would be MUCH greater.

    We'll see what the 100yd result ends up being.

    Thanks!

    Josh
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,636
    Messages
    9,955,713
    Members
    54,897
    Latest member
    jojo99
    Top Bottom