Breaking: Per SCOTUS, Same-Sex Marriage is now law of the land.

[Lowe0]

We still have a bunch of survivors of another round-up living on the Rez. Didn't occasion much shame when Earl Warren and FDR did their thing to protect liberty in 1942.

1942 predates the civil rights movement. At the time, we really didn't see any shame in how we treated non-whites.

Do you honestly think we're going to round up Christians and put them in camps? This is why there's no room for civil discussion anymore.

 

[Woobie]

No, and I don't think that's what he is saying. But if you think the civil rights movement was a magical event that changed forever human nature, well, I disagree. In 10 years there will be consequences for individuals who commit "hate-speech".

 

[foszoe]

Do you honestly think we're going to round up Christians and put them in camps? This is why there's no room for civil discussion anymore.

Depends on who the "we" is.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Let's focus on the real issues here. Three-Quarters of Adult Lesbians Overweight, Obese

Taxpayers Spend $3.5 Million to Find Out Why Lesbians Are Fat | MRCTV

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Let's focus on the real issues here. Three-Quarters of Adult Lesbians Overweight, Obese

Taxpayers Spend $3.5 Million to Find Out Why Lesbians Are Fat | MRCTV

If government should stay out of peoples' bedrooms, it would seem to follow it ought to stay out of their kitchens too.

 

[JollyMon]

Ow. Dude, even I wouldn't have said that. Whew.

Sometimes I have vomit of the mouth.

 

[KLB]

If government should stay out of peoples' bedrooms, it would seem to follow it ought to stay out of their kitchens too.

Well, that should be pretty obvious, but this is America...

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Well, that should be pretty obvious, but this is America...

Many of us care more about certain interests than principles.

 

[churchmouse]

Ow. Dude, even I wouldn't have said that. Whew.

I pulled the post.
Consider this an in thread warning.

Seriously guy's.........Limits.

 

[JollyMon]

I pulled the post.
Consider this an in thread warning.

Seriously guy's.........Limits.

My bad..... wont happen again

 

[Expat]

Dangit... now all of us will be wondering 'what the hell did he say?"

 

[JollyMon]

Dangit... now all of us will be wondering 'what the hell did he say?"

I didnt even think it was that bad, but I can see how it could be...... Guess you will just have to imagine....

 

[Expat]

I didnt even think it was that bad, but I can see how it could be...... Guess you will just have to imagine....

With the dirty mind that I have, it will likely be imagined much worse than it was....

Hold on....

Oh sick, that was gross, how could you.... ban him ban him now....

 

[jamil]

With the dirty mind that I have, it will likely be imagined much worse than it was....

Hold on....

Oh sick, that was gross, how could you.... ban him ban him now....

I imagined it much worse than it was and I saw what he wrote. So I think we should ban mbills.

 

[KG1]

I imagined it much worse than it was and I saw what he wrote. So I think we should ban mbills.

I second the motion. Resolution is passed.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Do you honestly think we're going to round up Christians and put them in camps? This is why there's no room for civil discussion anymore.

Let me get this straight: According to you, dismissing the possibility of the disparaged group of today being treated like the disparaged group of yesterday is a precondition for a 'civil' discussion? Seriously?

 

[cobber]

1942 predates the civil rights movement. At the time, we really didn't see any shame in how we treated non-whites.

Do you honestly think we're going to round up Christians and put them in camps? This is why there's no room for civil discussion anymore.

Who said anything about the CRM, but since you brung it up, post 14th Amendment, so the mechanism was already there, and FDR did his share of gassing about rights during the Great Depression.

Who would have thought Democrat icon FDR would round up American citizens with yellow skin, and leave the whiteys (German and Italian Americans) out. 1942 white privilege?


And to answer your second concern, time will tell. For now the government is only confiscating businesses (Oregon being the test case) and discussing adjusting the tax code for institutions that do not embrace the state religion.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Who said anything about the CRM, but since you brung it up, post 14th Amendment, so the mechanism was already there, and FDR did his share of gassing about rights during the Great Depression.

Who would have thought Democrat icon FDR would round up American citizens with yellow skin, and leave the whiteys (German and Italian Americans) out. 1942 white privilege?


And to answer your second concern, time will tell. For now the government is only confiscating businesses (Oregon being the test case) and discussing adjusting the tax code for institutions that do not embrace the state religion.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to cobber again.

Well said all the way around. Your choice of words regarding FDR and rights is perfect. It was indeed reminiscent of flatulence coming out of his face.

 

[Lowe0]

Let me get this straight: According to you, dismissing the possibility of the disparaged group of today being treated like the disparaged group of yesterday is a precondition for a 'civil' discussion? Seriously?

Yes. I don't know how much clearer I can make it.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Yes. I don't know how much clearer I can make it.

How do you justify this beyond, "This is America, that can't happen here" even though it already has?

This is analogous with setting up a scientific experiment and declaring that you will only accept results which conform to your expectations.

The Germans even had a difficult enough time accepting this type of eventuality that the Nazis shipped Jews to the border in respectable rail cars and boxed them up in Poland so as not to distress the sensibilities of Germans who were not prepared to accept what was happening (as I was informed by a Jew who slipped out under the wire).

So, now, other than your delicate sensibilities, how do you justify ruling out a potential outcome which history has proven repetitively to be realistic, probability notwithstanding other than you just don't f*cking like it therefore it is off the table?