Several time I have laid out the process to get that done. I don't believe a partisan crowd meets the process.The constitution lays out the eligibility requirements. It also lays out the redress of grievances. Why on earth would you believe that I have the burden of proof to prove you are ineligible and if I can't you are then constitutionally eligible?
The second amendment does not specify ANY eligibility requirements, hence we have infringement by governments with age requirements. Logically if they can make a 21 age limit stick, why can't it be raised to 91?
I do believe it is in the realm of the courts and legislators. Who decided the limitations on the first?
If the republicans, who tried to pass legislation to clear this mess up, believed it was a constitutional crisis in need of resolution they had 2016-2018 to do so. Why didn't they? Well that's speculation but apparently it wasn't a big deal anymore.
This is concrete though, how many here were writing letters to representatives and senators to accomplish that goal?