biden is a national security risk

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,555
    149
    Columbus, OH
    He won't run in 2024. He, at a minimum, the next 4 years is going have the GOP by the nuggets. He's going to be able to make a TON of legal money, as aspirants come to the palace to kiss the ring ang gain his blessing. Speaking totally neutral here, but he IMHO, will be much more powerful outside the WH rather than in. He's literally going to be giving the GOP marching orders for the forseeable future, and he'll create several clones of himself looking to fill the vaccum when he's gone.

    The dividing line here is of course the dichotomy between 'he's only in it for the money and power'/'he's a patriot who withstood hell to do what's best for the country he loves'

    Time will tell
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,674
    113
    Fort Wayne
    The dividing line here is of course the dichotomy between 'he's only in it for the money and power'/'he's a patriot who withstood hell to do what's best for the country he loves'

    Time will tell

    I think "time" is already screaming the answer at you. ;)
     

    maxwelhse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 21, 2018
    5,415
    149
    Michiana
    It ain't over yet. No telling what will happen and I am making no predictions. But it just is NOT over yet.

    But we do agree that on inauguration day it WILL be over, yes? That's what we're talking about here. Trump not attending the inauguration of Biden, should it happen, serves no good purpose.
     

    johny5

    not a shill account
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Apr 3, 2014
    959
    28
    Indianapolis
    But we do agree that on inauguration day it WILL be over, yes? That's what we're talking about here. Trump not attending the inauguration of Biden, should it happen, serves no good purpose.

    Did Trump say he would not attend the Inauguration?

    Also, I am old enough to remember when Biden skipped a presidential debate due to a "pandemic" because it was unsafe to be "on the same stage" with Trump...How's this different?
     

    GIJEW

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Mar 14, 2009
    2,716
    47
    It may be over but that won't make biden anything more than an illegitimate usurper. "Cheater in chief". They didn't accept the result last time and neither should we. The question now is how to resist? This fraudulent election deserves a Constitutional crisis...it is one itself.

    What if the legislatures of the states whose AGs joined the TX AG, all declared themselves "federal tax sanctuaries"--kind of like another boston tea party--or threatened to secede unless there is an honest election? At a minimum, a boycott by all the GOP of the inauguration to demonstrate it's illegitimacy. "Gentleman start your keyboards!". I know, it sounds like more of a long-shot than the TX AGs lawsuit but what's the alternative?
    IMO the dems are trying to establish one-party rule. They've politicized judicial appointments and promised to stack SCOTUS; corrupted the electoral process; their private propaganda agencies in the MSM practiced in-your-face censorship this election; they coopted marxist rioters--it didn't even merit condemnation at the DNC and kamala h. was organizing bail for them; and they've promised to disarm us. Bob Dylan said "You don't need to be a weatherman to know which way the winds blows"

    If that sounds hyperbolic, consider that the "Transition Integrity Project" (which seems to have planned biden's mail-in-ballot-comeback) had "war-gamed" this outcome if Trump won: biden refuses to concede (HC was on air saying this, this summer) and the "left coast" threatens to secede unless the GOP agrees to "reforms" that would guarantee future dem victories, like making Puerto Rico and DC into states. Almost all their scenarios involved street violence too.
     
    Last edited:

    maxwelhse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 21, 2018
    5,415
    149
    Michiana
    Did Trump say he would not attend the Inauguration?

    Also, I am old enough to remember when Biden skipped a presidential debate due to a "pandemic" because it was unsafe to be "on the same stage" with Trump...How's this different?

    I thought it was pretty clear that I was responding to the people in this thread who seem to be cheerleadering for him to skip it and not anything Trump has said directly.

    This is different because the last US president that didn't attend the inauguration of their successor was Nixon since he fled town before Ford was sworn in. If you really want Trump's enemies to have lots more ammunition to call him a petty little man AND further compare him to Nixon, this would be a great way to do it. Whether or not you like it, there are different rules for the left and the right and if you want Trump to continue to carry any independent voters he has to act "normal" through the transition. That means sucking it up and going to the inauguration of Biden and all of that jazz. He doesn't have to like it, but he does need to do it, IMO.
     

    MJM2378

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 21, 2012
    9
    1
    Columbus
    He (and his wife especially) must be scared to death. Crooked son and ‘going going gone’ mental faculties. It’ll be quite the scene when his crew of flunkies has to trot out the crew-served teleprompter for him to form a thought.

    World leaders will be laughing their a$$es off. If they aren’t already.
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,294
    113
    Martinsville
    Dear Santa, bring me US Balkanization for Christmas, so we no longer have to deal with this nonsense ever again and can live peacefully ever after.
     

    maxwelhse

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 21, 2018
    5,415
    149
    Michiana
    Sure you can, run them out of your region by force.

    They have their own clay to practice their insanity until their heart's content.

    I fell back into the current US border security policy without realizing we'd get a chance to do it over.

    I nominate Mr. Tombs as national security advisor of Indianastan.
     

    Amishman44

    Master
    Rating - 98.2%
    54   1   0
    Dec 30, 2009
    3,891
    113
    Woodburn
    Of course he is, the senile socialist sock puppet is a tool of anyone who will pay him through his family. He'll do anything for money including selling us all down the road. His #2 is only different in not being senile yet.

    Yes...he's all about his own personal gain...he's not for the 'betterment' of the United States as a country!

    I wonder if they're not setting him up to step aside more quickly for Kamala with the sudden explosion of information about his son and brother being under investigation.

    It's obvious, now, that Kamala is their choice for POTUS and that Joe was just placed in the nomination position so Kamala could ride his coat-tails to the Oval Office!
    3 months ago, the media 'buried' the Hunter Biden stories so that no one knew about them...and we now know that as high as 10% of voters who voted for Biden/Harris would have changed their vote had they known about the Hunter investigation(s).

    He hasn't taken the oath of office, which would make for some fun news nights if they find him unsuited to become president. The spin of the constitutional solution to this "problem" would truly be meteoric.

    Poor Crazy Joe...he's a puppet and doesn't even know it!
    The left will remove him, the only question is 'how' and we now know it may be through criminal indictment, and allow Kamala to step into the Oval Office!
    The only question is, who would she pick as VP? Obama? (Note: There's no stated limit to the number of terms a VP can serve!)

    Absolutely he is. A risk to a lot of things actually.

    He is and to a great number of things too...
    Here's just a few of the many concerns regarding Sniffy Joe:
    - Immigration / Amnesty
    - The Border Wall and Safety
    - Getting rid of ICE and Border Patrol
    - The First Amendment
    - The Second Amendment

    Just to name a few...
     
    Top Bottom