Beer Virus V

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    JCSR

    NO STAGE PLAN
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 11, 2017
    10,068
    133
    Santa Claus

    dusty88

    Master
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 11, 2014
    3,179
    83
    United States
    I hate being the one to tell you but you know the experts have been right so far ..........


    Biden's covid expert warns healthcare systems will collapse and patients will die in waiting rooms if trends continue -


    I think Osterholm, which is who you are talking about here, has been right about the pandemic since it began. I'd want to see his comment in context though not just a partial quote.

    as new model suggests 150,000 more people could die before his inauguration

    different person doing the modeling. Models are meant for learning and shifting, not meant for precise predictions
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I think Osterholm, which is who you are talking about here, has been right about the pandemic since it began. I'd want to see his comment in context though not just a partial quote.



    [/FONT]different person doing the modeling. Models are meant for learning and shifting, not meant for precise predictions

    I disagree. A model, whether epidemiological of related to climate, should first and foremost be used to make short term predictions in order to verify it is an accurate model. If not, it should be reformulated or discarded. To use an unverified construct to set policy is the height of foolishness, and coincidently exactly the heights we find ourselves occupying

    I have yet to see the model that says another lockdown will restart the economy as Biden says. I haven't even seen a model that tries to account for anything real world concerns other than reducing cases to a minimum, nor have i seen a model make any sort of empirically verified prediction about what the results of the first lockdown would be or what the second will accomplish. Simply saying 'It will reduce the number of cases' lacks useful specificity and sets the bar for accuracy unacceptably low
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    12,216
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    I disagree. A model, whether epidemiological of related to climate, should first and foremost be used to make short term predictions in order to verify it is an accurate model. If not, it should be reformulated or discarded. To use an unverified construct to set policy is the height of foolishness, and coincidently exactly the heights we find ourselves occupying

    I have yet to see the model that says another lockdown will restart the economy as Biden says. I haven't even seen a model that tries to account for anything real world concerns other than reducing cases to a minimum, nor have i seen a model make any sort of empirically verified prediction about what the results of the first lockdown would be or what the second will accomplish. Simply saying 'It will reduce the number of cases' lacks useful specificity and sets the bar for accuracy unacceptably low

    Exactly. If a model can not be used to predict short term trends and only applies to past history it is basically useless. We have real data for that (sort of).
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,881
    113
    I think Osterholm, which is who you are talking about here, has been right about the pandemic since it began. I'd want to see his comment in context though not just a partial quote.



    [/FONT]different person doing the modeling. Models are meant for learning and shifting, not meant for precise predictions
    Learning and shifting what if not predictions though? I would think without predictions its really just a historical study
     

    IndyBeerman

    Was a real life Beerman.....
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jun 2, 2008
    7,700
    113
    Plainfield
    I hate being the one to tell you but you know the experts have been right so far ..........


    Biden's covid expert warns healthcare systems will collapse and patients will die in waiting rooms if trends continue - as new model suggests 150,000 more people could die before his inauguration

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8951005/Before-Joe-Bidens-inauguration-70-000-people-die-COVID-19.html

    Ya, like it's bad enough we can't honest reporting from US based MSM, let's believe :poop: from the other side of the pond.
     

    dusty88

    Master
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 11, 2014
    3,179
    83
    United States
    Learning and shifting what if not predictions though? I would think without predictions its really just a historical study
    Well loosely predict then improve upon predictions. This is a brand new disease, and in a country that hasn't had a pandemic as serious for 100 years, when life was completely different.

    There is another model that's been more accurate than IHME, but the media doesn't cite it often. I'm trying to remember the name... but in any case a model is going to change when behavior changes or when we learn more about what works (or doesn't).
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,881
    113
    Well loosely predict then improve upon predictions. This is a brand new disease, and in a country that hasn't had a pandemic as serious for 100 years, when life was completely different.

    There is another model that's been more accurate than IHME, but the media doesn't cite it often. I'm trying to remember the name... but in any case a model is going to change when behavior changes or when we learn more about what works (or doesn't).

    With a novel disease, yeah predictive models would use other similar diseases as a starting point and iterate around new data. Thats why, ignoring the politics surrounding Covid, I find it perplexing that people hold Fauci to a certain standard regarding masks. Models should evolve and if a position on preventative measures or treatment changes its treated as a change in a political stance. Especially by those who claim to understand modeling
     

    NKBJ

    at the ark
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 21, 2010
    6,240
    149
    I'm curious as to why the double extra scary mutant bank bug isn't being played up here in America yet. Maybe the story is just being held in reserve for impact, for the next moves? I don't know, except I know I'm fed up with being played.
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    12,216
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    I'm still a little leery of the moderna vaccine at this point because of fauci's involvement in the development and ownership of the vaccine. He squandered any trust in him by spewing crap so I'll wait until any results are verified by independent means or actual population experience.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    What bothers me is the 'models' do not even seem to have terms or variables related to economic harm, they are solely focused on keeping cases to a minimum but with no benchmarks for accuracy or relevance. Thus we arrive at the masking debate, where there is evidence that masks might be somewhat effective but no benchmarks and no connection to the temporal component. If a universal mask mandate happens to coincide with the inevitable slowing of cases after a spike, it will not be called upon to demonstrate any sort of relevance to timing or required to predict what the rates of amelioration will look like, it will just be accorded any positive effects just because of proximity

    And without any concurrent modeling of economic effects, if there is a desire to do the most good at reducing transmission while concurrently minimizing economic disruption, there is no unified data and no tools

    Optimizing one variable and ignoring all others is what lets you wind up with an F106 when the enemy is no longer even relying on bombers to deliver its weapons
     
    Last edited:

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,769
    113
    Uranus
    https://twitter.com/teddyspeedboat/status/1306067145529360384


    tenor.gif
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom