- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
Got me a great big ol' brand new turkey injector yesterday at Rural King.
Hmm, now I gotta decide on a favor!
Under the circumstances, someone else cooking the bird for you would seem to be the perfect favor!
Got me a great big ol' brand new turkey injector yesterday at Rural King.
Hmm, now I gotta decide on a favor!
I hate being the one to tell you but you know the experts have been right so far ..........
Biden's covid expert warns healthcare systems will collapse and patients will die in waiting rooms if trends continue -
as new model suggests 150,000 more people could die before his inauguration
I think Osterholm, which is who you are talking about here, has been right about the pandemic since it began. I'd want to see his comment in context though not just a partial quote.
[/FONT]different person doing the modeling. Models are meant for learning and shifting, not meant for precise predictions
I disagree. A model, whether epidemiological of related to climate, should first and foremost be used to make short term predictions in order to verify it is an accurate model. If not, it should be reformulated or discarded. To use an unverified construct to set policy is the height of foolishness, and coincidently exactly the heights we find ourselves occupying
I have yet to see the model that says another lockdown will restart the economy as Biden says. I haven't even seen a model that tries to account for anything real world concerns other than reducing cases to a minimum, nor have i seen a model make any sort of empirically verified prediction about what the results of the first lockdown would be or what the second will accomplish. Simply saying 'It will reduce the number of cases' lacks useful specificity and sets the bar for accuracy unacceptably low
Learning and shifting what if not predictions though? I would think without predictions its really just a historical studyI think Osterholm, which is who you are talking about here, has been right about the pandemic since it began. I'd want to see his comment in context though not just a partial quote.
[/FONT]different person doing the modeling. Models are meant for learning and shifting, not meant for precise predictions
I hate being the one to tell you but you know the experts have been right so far ..........
Biden's covid expert warns healthcare systems will collapse and patients will die in waiting rooms if trends continue - as new model suggests 150,000 more people could die before his inauguration
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8951005/Before-Joe-Bidens-inauguration-70-000-people-die-COVID-19.html
Well loosely predict then improve upon predictions. This is a brand new disease, and in a country that hasn't had a pandemic as serious for 100 years, when life was completely different.Learning and shifting what if not predictions though? I would think without predictions its really just a historical study
Well loosely predict then improve upon predictions. This is a brand new disease, and in a country that hasn't had a pandemic as serious for 100 years, when life was completely different.
There is another model that's been more accurate than IHME, but the media doesn't cite it often. I'm trying to remember the name... but in any case a model is going to change when behavior changes or when we learn more about what works (or doesn't).
How 'bout an INGO Neil Diamond virtual karoke song, COVID-style?
[video=youtube_share;qxnETrhOIAE]http://youtu.be/qxnETrhOIAE[/video]
Christmas is cancelled.
[video=youtube;qTTvpxYIJ54]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTTvpxYIJ54[/video]
What about Hannukah and Kwanza?
Christmas is cancelled.
[video=youtube;qTTvpxYIJ54]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTTvpxYIJ54[/video]
Christmas is cancelled.
[video=youtube;qTTvpxYIJ54]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTTvpxYIJ54[/video]