SirRealism
Master
- Nov 17, 2008
- 1,779
- 38
2) The undisputed facts support prosecution: LS shot his gun inside City limits and that he was not shooting at the threat that he perceived. As the hypothetical conversation I posted last night points out, the failure to issue a citation is more absurd than issuing one.
I'm no lawyer, and I'm sure it shows, but how is "not shooting at the threat that he perceived" relevant? What applicable self defense law stipulates that shoot-to-kill is the only appropriate defense of self or property?