With all the talk in the media about gun control, the left proposes many policies. Some focus on the "who" by restrictions and further regulation on who can own guns. (licensing, mental health checks, training, etc...). Other proposals focus on the "what" like assault weapons bans, mag capacity bans, etc...
So.... if you had to choose one option, and death wasn't an option, would you rather go through a more rigorous screening process personally, and then be allowed access to any firearms or would you choose bans on specific types of weapons and magazine capacity, but the current background check system be left as-is?
I'm in favor of neither, but was interested how it would break down if you were FORCED to pick one option or the other.
So.... if you had to choose one option, and death wasn't an option, would you rather go through a more rigorous screening process personally, and then be allowed access to any firearms or would you choose bans on specific types of weapons and magazine capacity, but the current background check system be left as-is?
I'm in favor of neither, but was interested how it would break down if you were FORCED to pick one option or the other.