I'm glad someone else mentioned this. OP, is the 26 the only Glock you've got experience with? You've mentioned two issues with it: the subcompact size and the trigger. I'm wondering if some of the trigger issue isn't a consequence of your discomfort with the subcompact size. But since you didn't mention experience with the larger Glock frames, I don't know whether it would be pointless to suggest trying them out.OP: I am trying my best to help you out, but a few of your requiremets are a paradox. IMHO if you are looking for a better trigger than a glock, stay away from the DAO's like SIG and Beretta 92 clones. Even the DAK ~ (da/sa) triggers take practice to master.
I also give a +1 to the SR9c because its trigger is candy compared to a Glock. Just for the record, i drink glockaid but am not afraid to admit the Ruger's trigger is nice, its ergonomics are top notch and the oher requirement of your bearpaws hanging off the grip can be satisfied with the extended pinky magazing for the SR9c. There's no need to go for the full size SR9, as the afforementioned mag make it the same grip size - only the "c" has a better trigger.
Other recommend is the S&W M&P 9.
Also IMO, XD's trigers are comparable to the glock. Can't speak to the XDM, though i hear it's nicer.
*edit* i will also add that the SR9c will not fire without a magazine (mag safety) and has one extra fieldstrip/takedown step more than a glock.