Abolish the FBI

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • loudgroove

    Expert
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jul 7, 2023
    1,201
    113
    Lagrange Indiana
    My opinion is that the federal government is way too big to begin with. We are paying the wages with tax dollars. Cut the federal government in half and do away with everything but the 3 branches of government. and cut our taxes, gain more freedom without some gov agency without legislative powers imposing rules with penalties on us. The benefits go on and on. Its past time we the people lay off half of the feds!!!
     

    Shadow01

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 8, 2011
    4,085
    119
    WCIn
    Ok I'm on board with you so long as IF a group is reinstated, it has to be staffed by brand new people. With very strict rules about how they operate and at 90 there's a full audit. If they pass they get to operate for one year then a full audit again. If it works they get another year of not. Everyone is out on their ass and we try again.
    A complete revamp of the department before it is reinstated. Also as a fed department employee, you chose to work or vote, but not both. You make the choice.
     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    26,303
    150
    Avon
    A complete revamp of the department before it is reinstated. Also as a fed department employee, you chose to work or vote, but not both. You make the choice.
    Why don't we start with federal employees who use their position to influence the outcome of an election (which violates the Hatch Act, a lot) before denying rights cart blanche.
     

    Shadow01

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 8, 2011
    4,085
    119
    WCIn
    Why don't we start with federal employees who use their position to influence the outcome of an election (which violates the Hatch Act, a lot) before denying rights cart blanche.
    Some could slip through the crack. I prefer scorched earth, then apologizing if needed. You know all those worthless apologies after the fact that make everything ok?
     
    Top Bottom