The article doesn't say which court made that ruling. Was it the DC Court of Appeals???
That's the way I read it too. Could we both be wrong?Holy crap! If I read that right The District of Columbia enjoys Constitutional Carry and recognizes all State issued carry licenses as of right now. Surely I'm wrong?
Holy crap! If I read that right The District of Columbia enjoys Constitutional Carry and recognizes all State issued carry licenses as of right now. Surely I'm wrong?
I'm happy about this ruling but very, very disturbed that we are talking about the United States of AMERICA'S capitol. Gun ban in our nation's capitol. This ain't Canada! This ain't England!
Furthermore, this injunction prohibits the District from completely banning the carrying of handguns in public for self-defense by otherwise qualified non-residents based solely on the fact that they are not residents of the District.”
How many more years before they recognize other state carry licenses?