A pic I thought appropriate for this forum

[Jerchap2]

 

[jedi]

 

[James20]

 

[jake blue]

Pwned by a dead man! LOL

 

[thoroughbred]

Can I get a hot tub!

 

[Tinner666]

 

[BlackGun]

 

[churchmouse]

Rep Nazi's have you locked out....+6 to you sir.

 

[Ryno300]

Excellent!

 

[jrogers]

That's General Political, not 2nd Amendment. The ACA is off topic.

 

[MTC]

That's General Political, not 2nd Amendment. The ACA is off topic.

You don't get to dictate that.

It's an American thing. You wouldn't understand.

 

[Whosyer]

That's General Political, not 2nd Amendment. The ACA is off topic.

That's odd, I clearly see the words " second amendment " in his post.

 

[abedooley]

 

[jrogers]

That's odd, I clearly see the words " second amendment " in his post.

By that metric I can slap "second amendment" into any post and call it on topic here. The macro is exploiting a wedge issue which just happens to be the 2nd Amendment to attack the ACA, and firearms are only incidentally related. It's also factually inaccurate in its implication, as the Obama Administrations, whatever its failings, has not attempted to change or remove the Second Amendment. The macro belongs with all the rest of the screeching about socialism and black helicopters over in the General Political forum if it must be posted at all. That the OP called his own choice of subforum into question is reason enough to opine thereon.

It's an American thing. You wouldn't understand.

What, exactly, is the "American thing," and why wouldn't I understand? I assume you mean that to be read as a childish insult, but it's incoherent.

 

[warthog]

By that metric I can slap "second amendment" into any post and call it on topic here. The macro is exploiting a wedge issue which just happens to be the 2nd Amendment to attack the ACA, and firearms are only incidentally related. It's also factually inaccurate in its implication, as the Obama Administrations, whatever its failings, has not attempted to change or remove the Second Amendment. The macro belongs with all the rest of the screeching about socialism and black helicopters over in the General Political forum if it must be posted at all. That the OP called his own choice of subforum into question is reason enough to opine thereon. (emphasis mine)

They haven't? Really? No attempt? I suppose that you are correct in that they have not attempted to change the actual Constitutional Amendment but they have certainly done everything they can think of to abridge the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms. When the president was unable to pass his agenda through legitimate congressional channels, he simply tried to do it unilaterally with executive orders and by signing the UN Small Arms Treaty. Face it, Obama has tried to do all he can to prevent the legal, private ownership of firearms in this country. He has attacked it from every angle he can even attempting to strangle the ammo supply.

Maybe you don't understand American things?

 

[MTC]

What, exactly, is the "American thing," and why wouldn't I understand?

You'll figure it out eventually.

 

[HeadlessRoland]

JRog complaining about something? Naw... say it ain't so, Cecil!

 

[Birds Away]

All I read was "you can't pick on my president here, whaaa, whaaa.

 

[Phil502]

I get it and I like it!
You bet Obama has been trying to change the Second Amendment.....the interpretation of it anyway, close enough for me.

 

[darinb]

Nice and spot on. It is so true.