This is really about two things, but they're both on the same page, so I'm putting them in the same thread.
First, a friend of mine brought to my attention this article in the Wall Street Journal. The article is covers the basics of the Supreme Court case regarding the Second Amendment as a fundamental and individual right that "shall not be infringed" by states or cities, not just the federal government.
Then I noticed there is a poll about 3/4 of the way down the page asking whether the readers think the S.C. should rule that states and cities cannot infringe upon the right of the people to own and carry (keep and bear) arms. As of right now, we're about 75/20 in the right direction (with the rest unsure). Let's keep it that way... Go vote!
Link -> High Court Leans to Gun-Rights Side - WSJ.com
First, a friend of mine brought to my attention this article in the Wall Street Journal. The article is covers the basics of the Supreme Court case regarding the Second Amendment as a fundamental and individual right that "shall not be infringed" by states or cities, not just the federal government.
Then I noticed there is a poll about 3/4 of the way down the page asking whether the readers think the S.C. should rule that states and cities cannot infringe upon the right of the people to own and carry (keep and bear) arms. As of right now, we're about 75/20 in the right direction (with the rest unsure). Let's keep it that way... Go vote!
Link -> High Court Leans to Gun-Rights Side - WSJ.com