Would Thomas Jefferson Back the Financial Overhaul Bill?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ruger17hmr

    Shooter
    Rating - 97.1%
    33   1   0
    Jun 13, 2008
    648
    16
    Indy
    Would Thomas Jefferson Back the Financial Overhaul Bill?


    "It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world."
    - Thomas Jefferson






    The US Senate passed the biggest overhaul of the banking industry since the Great Depression and the potential exists that it will be a toothless tiger.

    We've long offered that the fatal flaw of financial regulation is that it's a political process while markets move in real-time. Factor in the interconnectedness of our finance-based global economy and weave in one quadrillion dollars in outstanding derivatives and you'll get a sense of the enormity of the task at hand.

    The fact that we've taken steps—not proactive steps, but steps—toward a solution set is a positive progression. Given how tenuous the political climate is, it's a small miracle it passed at all. The 2,300-page bill gives regulators ammunition to take aim at systemic risks and supervise previously unregulated trading, which moves the needle in the right direction.

    The issue at hand is that politicians still don't seem to grasp the magnitude of the current condition; this legislation is akin to adding a few cops to a big city with hopes that a riot doesn't break out. This beast has been building behind the scenes for over a decade and nobody cared as long as the screens were green. We're talking about risk gone awry and greed gone wild, the unfortunate manifestation of a few fatally flawed decisions by folks in a position of power. (See: Anatomy of a Recession)

    How deep-rooted is it? Let's revisit a discussion we had five years ago at the Minyans in the Mountains retreat in Ojai as a jumping off point. (See: Ojai Keynote)

    "The problem that comes from engaging in high risk behavior for which the consequences are absent, even if only temporarily, is that such high risk behavior begins to appear normal, and the entire scale of risk gets adjusted and pushed out. When we look at sentiment proxies such as the volatility indices and investor's intelligence reports, investors seem to be saying that it doesn't -- and won't -- matter.

    "Adding spice to that mix, a complex maze of derivatives has tied together the balance sheets of the world's largest organizations. With the emergence of bearded financials such as General Motors, General Electric (GE), and Ford (F) -- all of which have considerable finance arms -- it's quite possible that a ripple in Fannie Mae (FNM) or JPMorgan (JPM) will have an exponential impact across a wide array of sectors and industries."

    That was five years ago and despite the fright during the first phase of the financial crisis, the imbalances are cumulative still. The notion that General Motors or General Electric could be infected by a financial virus seemed nonsensical at the time and it wasn't until the wheels fell off the wagon that people paid attention. As reactive regulators learned the hard way, skating on your heels is a hard way to score—or achieve—a goal.

    This is no game, however; we're no longer talking about the automotive industry or stateside conglomerates. The cancer has spread globally, setting the stage for a more daunting sovereign sequel. Welcome to the Age of Government.com, where the elasticity of debt and the perceptions thereof will shape our lives for the foreseeable future. (See: A Five-Step Guide to Contagion)

    There's no way to know when this comeuppance will come to bear or if perhaps it might be avoided altogether. We can only hope. To say there are motivated global agendas to prolong the consequences of this unenviable outcome could be the understatement of the century. (See: The War on Capitalism)

    Take a moment to think about that. Think about what pushing risk out on the time continuum will do to the quality of life for our children. As my niece Maia would say, "Uncle Toddy, that's NG."

    It's difficult to gauge a semblance of timing when the rules of engagement are constantly in flux. When the other side of the perfect storm arrives however, the inability of this proposed legislation to stem the next iteration of contagion will likely feed a crisis of confidence. (See: The Eye of the Financial Storm)

    That shifting social mood has been brewing for some time as well and yes, it too is cumulative.

    Related Blog Headlines

     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 5, 2008
    1,219
    36
    10°17'42.48"N 85°5
    read this:

    [ame="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0880801484/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_2?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=0880800046&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=0V9028JP0MBHC40PX7KY"]Amazon.com: The 5000 Year Leap (Original Authorized Edition) (9780880801485): W.…[/ame]

    And compare to whats going on today. it will make you vomit. :)
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    Would Thomas Jefferson back the Federal Reserve?

    "If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
     

    T-rav

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Dec 3, 2009
    1,371
    36
    Ft. Wayne
    The money they have already spent, was not our money it was our children and grandchildren's. So I would say no. He would actually be very angry that we the people have let the country come to the state it is in now, he would of been PO'ed 100 years ago.
     

    woundedyak

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 22, 2009
    306
    16
    SouthSide
    IMO,Jefferson wouldn't even recognize the goverment we have today. He would line every president from Rutherford B. Hayes to Obama and slap the $*#@ out of them. Well, maybe Regan would get a pass. Just maybe.
     
    Last edited:

    John Galt

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 18, 2008
    1,719
    48
    Southern Indiana
    I love Jefferson! Our current administration is the anti-everything-the-Founding-Fathers-fought-for and established (minus the slavery issue, which Jefferson tried to fix)

    Some of my favorite Jefferson quotes:
    The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
    It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.
    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
    My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results From too much government.
    The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
     

    dross

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 27, 2009
    8,699
    48
    Monument, CO
    What about the Louisiana Purchase? He did it even though he knew he didn't have the authority to do it, and therefore it was unconstitutional. He knowingly violated the Constitution so as to achieve a practical end, that of removing French influence from the area.

    Sounds like a politician to me.
     

    ATOMonkey

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    7,635
    48
    Plainfield
    Yeah, he wasn't perfect, but he set up some really good guidelines that we all should aspire to in both our political and personal lives.

    The LA purchase was just too good to pass up. He was between a rock and a hard place. Napoleon practically gave away an entire country, and if we hadn't bought it, a foreign country would control the port of entry for our Western border.

    I would not want to be the one making that decision.

    Having said that...regulation is not the solution to our fiscal problems. As stated, they are systemic, and the solution can not be found within that flawed system.

    The real solution to our fiscal woes is a return to hard currency and the elimination of fiat currency.
     
    Top Bottom