modelflyer2003
Sharpshooter
She had applied for a gun permit in the beginning of December. She checked that she had been seen by a psychiatrist one time only in 1993, related to a divorce, because she absolutely refused to lie on the application. She mailed her application in to the state police. They sent it back in early February saying that she needed documentation from the psychiatrist stating she would be mentally stable enough to possess a firearm (or something to that effect). She called the psychiatrist’s office, but they purge their documents after 7 years, and had no record of her visit. She got a letter from them stating this fact, and she mailed it back about mid-February. Today an ISP Lieutenant called to speak with her about the visit. He wanted to know what the physician’s diagnosis was. She told him that if he made one, he never told her what it was, and that the psychiatrist saw no reason for her to have follow-up appointments, which was exactly what she put on the letter of explanation when she mailed it back to Indianapolis. The lieutenant said that he saw no reason to explore the issue further and would approve the application, and that they had to be careful about whom they gave licenses. I know that many of you would say that she should have checked no on the box, but my wife is not a liar. She had done nothing wrong. I just wondered what other people’s thoughts on the matter were. The long skinny is that my wife is finally getting her LTCH!
And as wtfd661 said, Good for her! For getting her permit. 
for your wife and the ISP LT.
