i believe my arguement does.
their is alot of dangerous gun handling in their store. with out the sign, quite often those weapons would be loaded and handled that way. the sign is not going to stop everybody, but hopefully people will read it, and at least make a mental note to leave their loaded weapon in the holster. if they want to show it off, then it had better be empty.
the sign says No loaded firearms. if they changed it to keep all firearms holstered, someone would break that rule, they would ask them to leave, and then we would have another person on here crying about they were mistreated, and all butt hurt because some one asked them to follow the rules.
lgs cant please everyone. they change the sign, someone wont like the new one. no sign and someone will try to sue when something bad happens and they will blame the lgs.
IT does not. The point Scutter has made which has been repeatedly ignored is that if this were a legal/risk issue GM, Dicks, and all the chain stores would be doing it too. The fact that they do not appear to be concerned about this should be good evidence that the concern is not viable.
You may be correct in your assumptions though that the LGS THINKS it will provide them some defense. If this is the case, they are probably mistaken. Closed claims are full of people being sued after clearly warning other persons of dangerous conditions etc. I would hope that in IN a jury would realize that the stupidity belongs to the owner of the ND not the LGS though.
The endgame of this all though is the whole "gunfree zone" argument. how can someone that believes that this is a ridiculous concept find a gunstore that enforces it to be anything but hypocritical? Their store, their rules. fine. Their store is not my store.