I have two well-broken in pocket guns. The Kahr CM9 is a bit over 1300 rounds without an issue (since Kahr CS replaced the original gun as defective). I trust it. I can shoot it. It is reliable. The Keltec P32 is (probably) at about 1000 rounds over 25 years with not a single issue. I trust it. I can shoot it. It is reliable. I have, for the last 2 weeks or so, been reading about the Ruger LCP (original), and .380 ACP in general. There is no practical difference between .32 ACP and .380 ACP with respect to ballistic effectiveness. As with any handgun caliber, shot placement rules the day. There is no practical difference between the size/weight of my P32, and the size/weight of the LCP. Knowing all this, why in the name of all that is good and right do I still want to buy a Ruger LCP? What is my problem?