Just as an FYI when Fauci is interviewed in a forum where he has an opportunity to give complete answers (ie not congressional testimonies which are often a showplace for the senator or congressman to make a speech and get a preplanned answer) he talks about the mask shortage but also the increasing information later that a significant % of infection was coming from people who were asymptomatic.
The asymptomatic spread is what changed my mind earlier this year.
But you can think Fauci is a total boob or a liar, and there is still evidence to use masks especially to protect others. (the latter is your point, I think, that you don't need to like Fauci to appreciate the potential of masks)
Kinda. My point was really two sub parts. One, Fouci admitted to lying "for the greater good", notwithstanding whatever new evidence came after that. That means that if it came down to the greater good again, he'd lie again. Two, contained in that admission was a tacist acknowledgement that he believed that masks were helpful then, and it appears that he still believes it.
To Tombs' point that doesn't address cloth masks at all. But where I differ from his position is that I think the jury is still out on the extent to which cloth masks can help stop the spread at the source. I think it's somewhere between 0 and 100, and probably on the short end of the zero half. To get that, I think we need to know it in terms of R0. In the mean time, like I said, I'm not wearing masks where I can socially distance myself from people. If I have to be somewhere that it's not possible, I'll wear the mask.