Based on my recent research of numerous posts and remarks made by various anti-gun advocates, I have come to the conclusion that the size of one's magazine is in direct disproportion to the size of their manhood.
Based on this logic, I have adjusted my magazine capacities accordingly.
In half-assed seriousness though, why is the first response, remark, retort, etc to anyone carrying/owning a gun, rifle, etc always have to do with the size of that person's penis and/or lack of testicular fortitude? I don't get it. For every 100 comments, you can almost bet on 73 of those being about a penis, calling them a boy, or calling them a "man".
Anyone have any insight?
Based on this logic, I have adjusted my magazine capacities accordingly.
In half-assed seriousness though, why is the first response, remark, retort, etc to anyone carrying/owning a gun, rifle, etc always have to do with the size of that person's penis and/or lack of testicular fortitude? I don't get it. For every 100 comments, you can almost bet on 73 of those being about a penis, calling them a boy, or calling them a "man".
Anyone have any insight?