Supreme Court News: New Deal Saves Prosecutors

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,279
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    A last minute deal will apparently keep the United States Supreme Court from deciding if prosecutors can be personally liable for fabricating cases against defendants.

    ****************************************************

    $12 Million Prevents a Supreme Court Ruling in Prosecutorial Abuse Case - Hit & Run : Reason Magazine

    Yesterday a settlement ended Pottawattamie County v. McGhee, a Supreme Court case that raised the question of when prosecutors can be held personally liable for misconduct they commit while accumulating evidence against a defendant. Terry Harrington and Curtis W. McGhee, who served 25 years for the 1978 murder of a retired police officer before being released, sued Dave Richter and Joseph Hrvol, the Pottawattamie County, Iowa, prosecutors who sent them to prison, accusing them of fabricating evidence, coercing witnesses, and hiding exculpatory evidence. The issue before the Court, which heard the case in November, was whether Richter and Hrvol committed these abuses in their roles as prosecutors, in which case longstanding precedent would make them immune from lawsuits, or in their roles as investigators, in which case they could be held personally liable. The $12 million settlement by the prosecutors and the county suggests they feared the Court would reach the latter conclusion.
    Radley Balko discussed the case here and here.

    ******************************************************

    Personally I am not shocked. This was a case had severe consequences for law enforcement.
     

    CarmelHP

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 14, 2008
    7,633
    48
    Carmel
    Prosecutorial immunity is qualified. If you're not acting in good faith (and if the claims were substantiated then it is pretty clear they were not, in fact, it would be intentional misconduct) then immunity can be stripped.
     

    alfahornet

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 25, 2008
    918
    16
    Well I guess he gets money. I would have preferred seeing a ruling as some prosecutor do abuse the system and overstep their bounds and then they should be liable.
     
    Top Bottom