I've just been pondering something and have not seen a good explanation anywhere online that covers this: I understand that there are taxes, regulations, paperwork, etc...for purchasing/using/picking your nose with/etc... a suppressor for a firearm here in the USA. What I've not found is a good basis for having to meet all those requirements for a firearm that due to its design and manufacturing is inherently 'suppressed', i.e. not by having something bolted onto it. Some firearms are just naturally 'louder' to shoot than others, and there are some basic design parameters that when followed would cause a firearm to be more or less noisy. Is there a documented legal requirement for firearms that are inherently quiet to be classified as using a 'suppressor' even when there isn't one 'attached' to the weapon? At what point does 'good design' become a 'suppressor'? Admittedly I've not dug too deeply into research, but it seems like there's some 'fuzzy math' going on here...
Xanderphillips
Xanderphillips