Some insurers stop writing new coverage for kids

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    Well, libertarians and others said this would happen when Obamacare was passed and now it has. Insurance companies are going to protect themselves however they can, as they should and it's already starting as they limit policies for children. It will only get worse as we progress down the road to a single payer system, which is what the government really wants to force on everyone.

    via AP

    WASHINGTON — Some major health insurance companies have stopped issuing certain types of policies for children, an unintended consequence of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul law, state officials said Friday.
    Florida Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty said in his state UnitedHealthcare and Blue Cross Blue Shield have stopped issuing new policies that cover children individually. Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner Kim Holland said a couple of local insurers in her state have done likewise.
    Starting later this year, the health care overhaul law requires insurers to accept children regardless of medical problems. Insurers are worried that parents will wait until kids get sick to sign them up, saddling the companies with unpredictable costs.
    The major types of coverage for children — employer plans and government programs — are not be affected by the disruption. But a subset of policies — those that cover children as individuals — may run into problems. Even so, insurers are not canceling children's coverage already issued, but refusing to write new policies.
    Industry officials estimate that children's policies account for 8 percent of single coverage plans sold directly to consumers.
    "Our plans are very concerned about this," said Alissa Fox, a top Washington lobbyist for the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. "If the law says that insurers have to take you any time, any place, some people will see that as an opportunity to wait until their children get sick to buy coverage."
    More at the source.
     
    Last edited:

    ATOMonkey

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    7,635
    48
    Plainfield
    Under the new law, I don't see why anyone would buy insurance until they were already sick.

    Fixing health insurance is really easy. Too bad no one actually wants to fix it. They just want something for nothing.
     

    downzero

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 16, 2010
    2,965
    36
    This is exactly what would be expected. Fortunately there is no public plan for the uninsured, so hopefully this will be a self-correcting problem.
     

    dross

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 27, 2009
    8,699
    48
    Monument, CO
    I disagree that it was an "unintended" consequence. It was always a first step to single payer. The bill is constructed in such a way that the private insurers will simply dwindle and go out of business, leaving only the government option.

    It wasn't unintended, it was the foundation of the plan.
     

    ATOMonkey

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    7,635
    48
    Plainfield
    I disagree that it was an "unintended" consequence. It was always a first step to single payer. The bill is constructed in such a way that the private insurers will simply dwindle and go out of business, leaving only the government option.

    It wasn't unintended, it was the foundation of the plan.


    +1 This wasn't done on accident.
     
    Top Bottom