Exclusive - Indoctrination 101: Teaching Chicago Students to Protest
"Williams: Right now in Springfield, they are moving to pass conceal and carry so that everybody can carry guns. Are you all in agreement with that?
Student: Um...I am because I think if you take away guns from regular citizens, the criminals and the police are the only ones who have them, so...
Williams: did you look at this?
[At that point, she held up a list to young people who have been killed with guns.]
Student: Yes, ma'am, I did.
Williams: How many of these kids on here are able to carry a gun?
Student: None of them.
Williams: And they are the leading targets."
Am I reading this correctly? Did this student state that they support the second ammendment because those without guns can become victims? If so, am I reading this correctly that the "instructor" validated the students opinion by pointing out that non gun carrying teens were the victims of gun wielding criminals? I only wish I could have participated long enough to call the instructor out!
Student: Um...I am because I think if you take away guns from regular citizens, the criminals and the police are the only ones who have them, so...
Williams: did you look at this?
[At that point, she held up a list to young people who have been killed with guns.]
Student: Yes, ma'am, I did.
Williams: How many of these kids on here are able to carry a gun?
Student: None of them.
Williams: And they are the leading targets."
Am I reading this correctly? Did this student state that they support the second ammendment because those without guns can become victims? If so, am I reading this correctly that the "instructor" validated the students opinion by pointing out that non gun carrying teens were the victims of gun wielding criminals? I only wish I could have participated long enough to call the instructor out!