SemperFiUSMC
Master
- Jun 23, 2009
- 3,480
- 38
Why not? They can steal your children for being overweight and you may never get them back.I found this not only funny, but also sobering. The preposterous notion that a government could put you on a diet....
Why not? They can steal your children for being overweight and you may never get them back.
County places obese Cleveland Heights child in foster care | cleveland.com
It has a valid purpose but it can be overused. Trust me when I say there are a lot of kids in horrible conditions and I have seen this first hand. DCS has its problems but I am happy they are there when I need them.Child protective services is a sham. The states get federal dollars for every child inducted into the system. It is another instance of redistribution of wealth.
All he did was go off on the guy. He talked down to him and didn't persuade anyone of anything. To win you have to attract more votes than just those of the people who agree with you.WHERE IS THIS PAUL?!? I know that he is probably a bit hesitant about being portrayed as even more "nutty" (I don't believe this), but I really think he could turn a few heads his way with some hard truth like above. I would really like to see this Paul in a debate one on one with Obama.
All he did was go off on the guy. He talked down to him and didn't persuade anyone of anything. To win you have to attract more votes than just those of the people who agree with you.
In Pauls own words I saw last week in a link in this forum, he continullay gets relected over and over and over, again and again. Well, it shows. Because of that, the art of persuassion was lost on him and it still shows today.
NOW, I can understand getting amped up while on the Morton Downey show and that is only a 1 minute clip. God only knows what was going on prior in that episode but Paul is no Salesman.
He already acknowledges his failure. His Son is much more polished. We will just have to wait for 2016 and see what comes of the new crop of Conservatives. The problem is what if history does not wait?
So right now we have Newt vs Romney. No, Paul could have adapted long before 2011. Relics don't adapt.
I see your point. In other words we have candidates like Romney and Gingrich as front runners because of Ron Paul's inability to adapt.He already acknowledges his failure. His Son is much more polished. We will just have to wait for 2016 and see what comes of the new crop of Conservatives. The problem is what if history does not wait?
So right now we have Newt vs Romney. No, Paul could have adapted long before 2011. Relics don't adapt.
I see your point. In other words we have candidates like Romney and Gingrich as front runners because of Ron Paul's inability to [STRIKE]adapt[/STRIKE] sell himself and his policies.
Presidential White Papers: Ron Paul"Ron Paul is a purist, too often at the cost of real accomplishments." "It is perfectly legitimate, and in fact vital, that think tanks, free-market groups, and individual members of Congress develop and propose idealized solutions. But presidents have the responsibility of making progress, and often, Ron Paul opposes progress because, in his mind, the progress is not perfect."
Now you are just making me feel worse because you are right.This is one example of why a Ron Paul presidency would be ineffectual because of his inability to adapt.
Presidential White Papers: Ron Paul
I think I have to agree with you on this one. As much as I dislike Hillary and I wasn't to hip on Huckabee I think we would all have been better of if that were the case.Today before I went to work I said to my GF what the hell happened? I want a recall for the entire year of 2008. I want Huckabee vs Hillary and I don't care who wins, just give me a do over.