that thread is over here.....
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo.../420595-colin-kaepernick-protests-anthem.html
I just did. Are you going to continue attempting to provoke a hostile response by playing the player rather than the ball, or are you going to admit that you were actually wrong when you mis-used the word treason?If you say so.
Im sure the 18 people that actually were convicted for involvement in Iran-Contra, hold the same opinion.
Remind me. How many of them were convicted of treason?
...and to stick with the thread:
View attachment 64121
I just did. Are you going to continue attempting to provoke a hostile response by playing the player rather than the ball, or are you going to admit that you were actually wrong when you mis-used the word treason?
What a simple, simple world some people live in.
Where you don't have to think about the fact that ISRAEL was the one who actually funneled the weapons to Iran...and why would it ever do that? Because they want Iran better armed? Or maybe because there was upheaval in Iran and even the then-present Iranian government with its significant faults were better than the alternative of having Iran become cozy with the Soviets and gain access to weapons far beyond what was done in the Iran-Contra deal or having a new government take over that was completely unpredictable...and certainly even more dangerous to Israel and the U.S.
You also don't have to think about the fact that Iraq was overwhelming Iran in the war and maybe it was in the best interests of the U.S. for that war to go on and on....and weaken both countries.
No need to think about the fact that there was thought to, at least, be the potential of strengthening a more moderate faction within the Iranian government which wanted better relations with the U.S. and only approving it after assurances were given that this more moderate faction was opposed to terrorism and was actively combating it.
It's fine to question the wisdom of the plan...I've done that...but treason? That conclusion smacks of a position taken because of the identity of the president involved rather than what the reasons for the operation were.