Political funny picture thread, part 3

[Kutnupe14]

So much evidence of....

Help me out, here.

Russian involvement to help get Trump elected? At least that what ALL the intelligence agencies say... but I can see how some, with their own multi-million dollar funded intelligence agencies, would contest their findings.

 

[indiucky]

So much evidence of....

Help me out, here.

I got you brother....But I think we ought to just let it ride...

 

[indiucky]

 

[HoughMade]

Russian involvement to help get Trump elected? At least that what ALL the intelligence agencies say... but I can see how some, with their own multi-million dollar funded intelligence agencies, would contest their findings.

There seems to be evidence of Russia trying to foment discord and cause chaos in the elective process. That's not quite the same thing. Notably, so far, there is an absence of evidence of involvement by Trump, so....

 

[JettaKnight]

Trump Derangement Syndrome.

I'm inclined to agree.

From everything I've seen and heard, the Russians paid people to hold rallies and such. If the Trump campaign had know knowledge and no involvement, then you can't really fault them.


The wise sage Warren Zevon said it best, "How was I to know she was with the Russians too?"

 

[indiucky]

The wise sage Warren Zevon said it best, "How was I to know she was with the Russians too?"

Well gambling in Havana involves a little risk....

 

[Kutnupe14]

There seems to be evidence of Russia trying to foment discord and cause chaos in the elective process. That's not quite the same thing. Notably, so far, there is an absence of evidence of involvement by Trump, so....

Wait... are you saying the intelligence agencies didn't come to the conclusion that the Russians interfered in the election to help Trump get elected? Because that's all I said, I didn't weigh in on the effectiveness.

 

[JettaKnight]

Wait... are you saying the intelligence agencies didn't come to the conclusion that the Russians interfered in the election to help Trump get elected? Because that's all I said, I didn't weigh in on the effectiveness.

If you haven't listened yet, Radiolab did a good story on a Russian sponsored pro-Trump rally.

 

[printcraft]

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153

When mass protests against Russian President Vladimir Putin erupted in Moscow in December 2011, Putin made clear who he thought was really behind them: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

She should count herself lucky she didn't get a polonium cocktail.

 

[2A_Tom]

TDS sufferers will give up in 2024...



Well maybe not , I could be wrong. The funny thing is they believe any one with out TDS luv Trump.

 

[JettaKnight]

TDS sufferers will give up in 2024...



Well maybe not , I could be wrong. The funny thing is they believe any one with out TDS luv Trump.

There's plenty of us sans love and sans hate.


#MehTrump

I dunno, doesn't have a good ring to it.

 

[2A_Tom]

I am in that crowd personally, but i kinda like this song.
[video=youtube;5Qk9o_ZeR7s]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qk9o_ZeR7s[/video]

And this one.
[video=youtube;S94Bh3Qez9o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S94Bh3Qez9o[/video]

 

[BugI02]

Russian involvement to help get Trump elected? At least that what ALL the intelligence agencies say... but I can see how some, with their own multi-million dollar funded intelligence agencies, would contest their findings.

So I take it then that you also accept Global Warming/Climate Change as fact? After all, virtually ALL the scientists say its revealed truth ... unless you have your own multi-million dollar funded research agency so as to contest their findings

Alternately, you could reject the assertions of all those true believers (of either stripe). You only have to realize that they are driven by an agenda more than they are the facts. Diverse circumstances, same underlying mechanism, same results

 

[BugI02]

Wait... are you saying the intelligence agencies didn't come to the conclusion that the Russians interfered in the election to help Trump get elected? Because that's all I said, I didn't weigh in on the effectiveness.

You are confusing 'intelligence agencies' with 'The Washington Post' and 'The New York Times'. It's an easy mistake for the credulous to make

I believe if you check, you'll find they are the only choristers of the deep state 'mouth congress' that are pushing that particular narrative

 

[nonobaddog]

So I take it then that you also accept Global Warming/Climate Change as fact? After all, virtually ALL the scientists say its revealed truth ... unless you have your own multi-million dollar funded research agency so as to contest their findings

Alternately, you could reject the assertions of all those true believers (of either stripe). You only have to realize that they are driven by an agenda more than they are the facts. Diverse circumstances, same underlying mechanism, same results

You know, this brings up something that really pisses me off. I enjoyed sciences at all levels in school and did part of my career in medical research. I believe there was a time when you could believe the results of scientific study. But now it has been polluted by politics and you can't believe any of the crap they say. I remember the first time I saw this pollution. It was back on the first Earth Day in 1970. The liberal so-called "science people" were pushing their agenda and made all sorts of predictions based on their "scientific" studies. Well not one single prediction they made came true. I have had a chance to look at some of the data those crappy predictions were based on and they certainly did not use any kind of acceptable logic to reach their "conclusions". They made every imaginable analysis mistake to massage their data into what they wanted to say all along. I hate that they did this because this pollution has spread and damaged the credibility of all scientific study and the basis for much of human advancement.

 

[BugI02]

Yep, I find the viewpoint championed by Scott Adams suasive. The theories of global warming/climate change cannot make accurate predictions (which is the gold standard test for the veracity of hypotheses); and not only do they still wish us to accept the conclusions, but they wish to make sweeping economic policy changes despite economics being another area with a poor record of prognostication

It's not doubling down, it's error squared; and it can do real damage to our economy with no realistic expectation that the underlying predictions will come true any more often than by chance

 

[sharkey]

 

[Jerchap2]

A few other possibilities include

Double Jeopardy
50 Shades of Black
Ancestry Dot Commie
Spies, Lies, and Wiretapping
Me, Myself, and I
Fake is the New Truth
Drone Sweet Drone
Hail to the Thief
Benghazi Blues

[stolen from https://www.facebook.com/ForAmerica...ombcj1Z0rIY_GjW2rjPw1e2LIeeYzNaPC3tag&fref=nf]

 

[sharkey]

A few other possibilities include

Double Jeopardy
50 Shades of Black
Ancestry Dot Commie
Spies, Lies, and Wiretapping
Me, Myself, and I
Fake is the New Truth
Drone Sweet Drone
Hail to the Thief
Benghazi Blues

[stolen from https://www.facebook.com/ForAmerica...ombcj1Z0rIY_GjW2rjPw1e2LIeeYzNaPC3tag&fref=nf]

You left out "This Old Bathhouse"

 

[sharkey]