I don't see how anything thte UN passes gun wise can affect us.
Heck, you have a hard time finding .22 ammo right now.
Pffft, don't worry, I read this gun espurt forum called INGO and INGO says that Obama won't ever do anything on guns.
Would this be even close to be constitutional?
I don't see how anything thte UN passes gun wise can affect us.
Getting the licensing for ammunition manufacturing isn't the easiest thing to do, and the insurance requirements and price of machinery are ridiculous.Is everyone still having a hard time finding 22lr, wow I feel special I come across it quite often I think that there would be a lot more domestic companies popping up and reloading supplies would become even more scarce for a while
Blue helmets equal non-domestic troops equals same same an invader which is one of the main reasons behind the 2nd amendment. All Hell will break loose if that happens.
In the New World Order, all things constitutional won't be referring to the one adopted by the US back in 1787. That one basically stands in the way of what our current administration is collusive with along with most of the rest of the world. If this administration falls in line with the UN we've been the majority donor to since its inception, the dots should become easier to connect as to why DHS has been making the purchases we read about and what our "leaders" expect to happen when blue-hats start coming out in the open. "Peace-keeping forces" kill people and the UN peace keepers have been doing it off-and-on for over 60 years.
This has the potential to suck reeeeeal hard.
Blue helmets equal non-domestic troops equals same same an invader which is one of the main reasons behind the 2nd amendment. All Hell will break loose if that happens.
What? .22lr is hard to get now.
If that were the case then I would have heard something on INGO about it . . . other than the 12,997 threads about them thar "gougers", conspiracies by Wal-Mart employees and how DHS is buying up .22s at Gander Mountain for their secret war on tin cans.
Just sent one to Senator Coats, Donnelly is next. Aim for the US Senators with the e-mail, the senate ratifies treaties.
Well if a state of emergency were declared that would entirely change the field of play. One supposed terrorist attack originating from a US based group would be ample cause in our government's reasoning to declare a state of emergency or even total martial law. Just about anything could be done without senatorial permission.I realize what I'm about to post makes it sound like I applied half a roll of Reynolds Wrap to my Colts cap, but bear with me.
Dingy Harry wouldn't bring the left-coast gun-grabber's bill up for the entire Senate because it was DOA (maybe had 40 votes). Sends his boy Kerry to the UN, big whoop. A treaty has to be ratified by the same Senate that won't even be voting on basically the same thing.
Possible tin-foil hat part: since when does this administration give a flippin anything about the US Constitution or the rule of law? The senate won't ratify the UN Gun Ban? No problem, just order it implemented. Who's gonna say no? Holder? Napolitano? DHS has 2.1 billion rounds of hollow points, how many did Justice Dept entities (DEA, FBI, US Marshalls, BATFE) buy? This is scary.