The wife and I have been looking at 10/22s in order to start Appleseed. We have priced several, because when we buy, we're buying two. I asked to see one at Cabela's. The guy handed it to me--he didn't ask to see my ID because it isn't necessary. I checked the chamber, gave it the once over, and handed it to the wife. She said that she liked it as well, and liked the feel. We discussed some modifications. Suddenly, another clerk came over where we were standing. My wife expressed her interest in Appleseed and stated that we would rather buy from Cabela's than Walmart. Just being chatty. The man ignored her, looked at me said, "excuse me sir, are you planning on trying to buy that for her?"
I responded "I'm not planing on buying it at all now. I don't participate in straw-buying, sir." I handed the rifle back and we walked out of the store. To retell the story, it perhaps doesn't sound like anything, but as we were walking away, my wife asked of what were we being accused. I explained to her and she became about as angry as I was. She understood that the man's tone was accusatory and that I held my temper.
I understand the law. When Bloomberg pulled his little gun sting, several gun stores back home in Virginia were tagged for straw purchases. All were found not-guilty, but I know the law. Both my wife and I have Indiana residency. I have every right to purchase a firearm for my wife if she is present with her identification. Why did the clerk not think that my wife was purchasing the gun for herself? I didn't involve the management because I really don't think it would make a difference. I expect the opposition not to know, understand, or respect the laws, but not an individual involved in the sale of firearms. I also understand that people make mistakes, but his tone was accusatory, like he had just stopped out nefarious plan. I've seen this old guy working in there since for at least the last few years--not that he should remember me, but that he should know better than to address folks like that. My few paltry dollars won't make a difference to them, but I'll not be shopping there in the future.
I responded "I'm not planing on buying it at all now. I don't participate in straw-buying, sir." I handed the rifle back and we walked out of the store. To retell the story, it perhaps doesn't sound like anything, but as we were walking away, my wife asked of what were we being accused. I explained to her and she became about as angry as I was. She understood that the man's tone was accusatory and that I held my temper.
I understand the law. When Bloomberg pulled his little gun sting, several gun stores back home in Virginia were tagged for straw purchases. All were found not-guilty, but I know the law. Both my wife and I have Indiana residency. I have every right to purchase a firearm for my wife if she is present with her identification. Why did the clerk not think that my wife was purchasing the gun for herself? I didn't involve the management because I really don't think it would make a difference. I expect the opposition not to know, understand, or respect the laws, but not an individual involved in the sale of firearms. I also understand that people make mistakes, but his tone was accusatory, like he had just stopped out nefarious plan. I've seen this old guy working in there since for at least the last few years--not that he should remember me, but that he should know better than to address folks like that. My few paltry dollars won't make a difference to them, but I'll not be shopping there in the future.