Nation Wide CCW

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Do you think this will pass?


    • Total voters
      0

    Manan

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jun 28, 2009
    1,061
    38
    West Central
    Would be great if their was a nationwide conceal carry reciprocity between the states, similar to drivers licenses. But unfortunately, I doubt that it will happen, particularly within the current administration.
     

    ATM

    will argue for sammiches.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Jul 29, 2008
    21,019
    83
    Crawfordsville
    I would like to put in a late vote for NO based on a congressional rule change.:xmad:



    ETA: Of course, I maintain that Wisconsin and Illinois suck.
     

    bigg cheese

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 17, 2009
    1,111
    36
    Crawfordsville
    I for one hope that this does not pass.

    This, to me, is an attempt to federalize a states issue.

    What the federal government is trying to do appease the masses by making a federal law that we like. We complain when it passes blanket country-wide laws that infringe on our second amendment rights (and in turn look to the states as our rule), but when it tries to pass a law that supports them, we support it?

    It's trying to appease us first, so that we agree that it has the final say, and then later it will abuse that authority.
     

    henktermaat

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jan 3, 2009
    4,952
    38
    I for one hope that this does not pass.

    This, to me, is an attempt to federalize a states issue.

    What the federal government is trying to do appease the masses by making a federal law that we like. We complain when it passes blanket country-wide laws that infringe on our second amendment rights (and in turn look to the states as our rule), but when it tries to pass a law that supports them, we support it?

    It's trying to appease us first, so that we agree that it has the final say, and then later it will abuse that authority.

    2nd amendment is a bill of rights issues- This bill would have lessened the limitations currently existing on a fundamental, nationwide right.
     

    bigg cheese

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 17, 2009
    1,111
    36
    Crawfordsville
    It almost seems like these legislators think the Second Amendment needs clarifying.

    It's pretty obvious what it means, and just doing what it says should suffice.
     

    wally05

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    42   0   0
    Dec 2, 2008
    1,011
    48
    I for one hope that this does not pass.

    This, to me, is an attempt to federalize a states issue.

    What the federal government is trying to do appease the masses by making a federal law that we like. We complain when it passes blanket country-wide laws that infringe on our second amendment rights (and in turn look to the states as our rule), but when it tries to pass a law that supports them, we support it?

    It's trying to appease us first, so that we agree that it has the final say, and then later it will abuse that authority.

    I disagree. It's the people in the government trying to actually restore rights that shouldn't be limited by the states in the first place.
     

    indykid

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 27, 2008
    11,938
    113
    Westfield
    For what it's worth, Lugar must go!!!

    Senate record on who voted:

    U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 1st Session

    as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate

    Vote Summary

    Question: On the Amendment (Thune Amdt. No. 1618 )
    Vote Number: 237
    Vote Date: July 22, 2009, 12:01 PM
    Required For Majority: 3/5
    Vote Result: Amendment Rejected
    Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 1618 to S. 1390 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010)
    Statement of Purpose: To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to allow citizens who have concealed carry permits from the State in which they reside to carry concealed firearms in another State that grants concealed carry permits, if the individual complies with the laws of the State.
    Vote Counts: YEAs 58 NAYs 39 Not Voting 3

    Alphabetical by Senator Name Akaka (D-HI), Nay
    Alexander (R-TN), Yea
    Barrasso (R-WY), Yea
    Baucus (D-MT), Yea
    Bayh (D-IN), Yea
    Begich (D-AK), Yea
    Bennet (D-CO), Yea
    Bennett (R-UT), Yea
    Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
    Bond (R-MO), Yea
    Boxer (D-CA), Nay
    Brown (D-OH), Nay
    Brownback (R-KS), Yea
    Bunning (R-KY), Yea
    Burr (R-NC), Yea
    Burris (D-IL), Nay
    Byrd (D-WV), Not Voting
    Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
    Cardin (D-MD), Nay
    Carper (D-DE), Nay
    Casey (D-PA), Yea
    Chambliss (R-GA), Yea
    Coburn (R-OK), Yea
    Cochran (R-MS), Yea
    Collins (R-ME), Yea
    Conrad (D-ND), Yea
    Corker (R-TN), Yea
    Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
    Crapo (R-ID), Yea
    DeMint (R-SC), Yea
    Dodd (D-CT), Nay
    Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
    Durbin (D-IL), Nay
    Ensign (R-NV), Yea
    Enzi (R-WY), Yea
    Feingold (D-WI), Yea
    Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
    Franken (D-MN), Nay
    Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
    Graham (R-SC), Yea
    Grassley (R-IA), Yea
    Gregg (R-NH), Yea
    Hagan (D-NC), Yea
    Harkin (D-IA), Nay
    Hatch (R-UT), Yea
    Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
    Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
    Inouye (D-HI), Nay
    Isakson (R-GA), Yea
    Johanns (R-NE), Yea
    Johnson (D-SD), Yea
    Kaufman (D-DE), Nay
    Kennedy (D-MA), Not Voting
    Kerry (D-MA), Nay
    Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
    Kohl (D-WI), Nay
    Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
    Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
    Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
    Leahy (D-VT), Nay
    Levin (D-MI), Nay
    Lieberman (ID-CT), Nay
    Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
    Lugar (R-IN), Nay
    Martinez (R-FL), Yea
    McCain (R-AZ), Yea
    McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
    McConnell (R-KY), Yea
    Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
    Merkley (D-OR), Nay
    Mikulski (D-MD), Not Voting
    Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
    Murray (D-WA), Nay
    Nelson (D-FL), Nay
    Nelson (D-NE), Yea
    Pryor (D-AR), Yea
    Reed (D-RI), Nay
    Reid (D-NV), Yea
    Risch (R-ID), Yea
    Roberts (R-KS), Yea
    Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
    Sanders (I-VT), Nay
    Schumer (D-NY), Nay
    Sessions (R-AL), Yea
    Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
    Shelby (R-AL), Yea
    Snowe (R-ME), Yea
    Specter (D-PA), Nay
    Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
    Tester (D-MT), Yea
    Thune (R-SD), Yea
    Udall (D-CO), Yea
    Udall (D-NM), Yea
    Vitter (R-LA), Yea
    Voinovich (R-OH), Nay
    Warner (D-VA), Yea
    Webb (D-VA), Yea
    Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
    Wicker (R-MS), Yea
    Wyden (D-OR), Nay
     
    Top Bottom