Look what Herman Cain ate for breakfast

[public servant]

I thought Kissinger was Jewish?

What would you expect from a guy with ties to Stormfront?

 

[KG1]

Would it be possible to talk about Obama and Ron Paul in another thread? Bring on the discussion.

Yeah, Keep that other junk outta here. This is about what Herman Cain ate for breakfast. Read the title of the thread for cripes sake.

 

[Expat]

What would you expect from a guy with ties to Stormfront?

Your killing today.

 

[public servant]

I think we all know what this thread is really about. I was born on a Saturday...but not last Saturday.

 

[public servant]

Your killing today.

Like rambone...I just call 'em like I see 'em.

 

[UncleMike]

Like rambone...I just call 'em like I see 'em.

Well......
Then you need to close your eyes.

 

[KG1]

I think we all know what this thread is really about. I was born on a Saturday...but not last Saturday.

I think Herman Cain ate Henry Kissinger for breakfast. In one bite. Then he got indigestion.

 

[public servant]

OK...is it just me...or does anyone else think this chick is kind of hot??

 

[Lex Concord]

Hammer on nail!

Sorry, the analogy doesn't work.

Allowing a photo with a (possibly) unknown supporter is not the same as having breakfast with a well known person such as Kissinger.

Does it mean that Ron didn't know the guy, what he was? Of course not...it can't be proved either way. I'd say the probability runs strongly in favor of Ron pausing for a photo with a supporter, but YMMV

Is there a snowball's chance in hell Cain doesn't know who Kissinger is or what he stands for? I find it unlikely

I do, however, find it more likely that Cain had never heard of Kissinger than that you would miss a chance to slam Paul on this forum.

 

[public servant]

Sorry, the analogy doesn't work.

Neither does yours. Paul knew where the campaign contribution came from and what Stormfront stands for. He kept the money.

I wouldn't have. Would you?

 

[Lex Concord]

OK...is it just me...or does anyone else think this chick is kind of hot??

I think it's just you.

 

[Phil502]

OK...is it just me...or does anyone else think this chick is kind of hot??

I'm in but I'll have to shift to my right.

 

[Expat]

OK...is it just me...or does anyone else think this chick is kind of hot??

I would have to have a couple beers to keep the upside down cross from freaking me out.

 

[Lex Concord]

Neither does yours.

Really, what analogy did I make?

Paul knew where the campaign contribution came from and what Stormfront stands for. He kept the money.

Are you saying he knew that at the time the photo was taken? That was the point of my comment.

I wouldn't have. Would you?

Yes.

 

[public servant]

I would have to have a couple beers to keep the upside down cross from freaking me out.

Stand her on her head?

 

[NYFelon]

Stand her on her head?

 

[Bill of Rights]

Neither does yours. Paul knew where the campaign contribution came from and what Stormfront stands for. He kept the money.

I wouldn't have. Would you?

To put to some good use? Probably. To keep it from being put to bad use? Almost surely.

Isn't that what LE does when seizing items, money, or property used in the drug trade? The difference is that the money given to RP was freely given, not seized by force.

The theory of entropy is exemplified in that if you have a barrel of fine wine and add a teaspoon of raw sewage, you have sewage, but if you have a barrel of sewage and add a teaspoon of fine wine, you still have sewage.

While this works for many things, it does not work for money. It may have come from ill causes and pursuits, but it can quickly be turned to good uses and turned against those from whom it was given.

I'd be up front about who I am and where I come from. If they chose to still give me money, it would not buy them my support of their goals.

Blessings,
Bill

 

[KG1]

Wasn't this thread about Herman Cain, anyway?

I think this thread is about guilt by association more than anything. And before we continue cooking Cain's bacon so to speak, does anybody really know exactly what the specifics were or what was discussed in this so called "foreign policy" chowdown?

 

[UncleMike]

To put to some good use? Probably. To keep it from being put to bad use? Almost surely.

Isn't that what LE does when seizing items, money, or property used in the drug trade? The difference is that the money given to RP was freely given, not seized by force.

The theory of entropy is exemplified in that if you have a barrel of fine wine and add a teaspoon of raw sewage, you have sewage, but if you have a barrel of sewage and add a teaspoon of fine wine, you still have sewage.

While this works for many things, it does not work for money. It may have come from ill causes and pursuits, but it can quickly be turned to good uses and turned against those from whom it was given.

I'd be up front about who I am and where I come from. If they chose to still give me money, it would not buy them my support of their goals.

Blessings,
Bill

Nope....
Seized property is taken because it was garnered through illegal activities.
If it was not the result of illegal activities the rightful owner can petition the Court to have it returned.

 

[Expat]

Stand her on her head?

Good choice. I think I saw that maneuver in one of the Gang Bang Auditions series.