From the article...
"We will not accept any treaty that infringes on the constitutional rights of our citizens to bear arms," he said.
U.S. officials have acknowledged privately that the treaty under discussion would have no effect on domestic gun sales and ownership because it would apply only to exports.
I could missing something... but is this anything to be fearful of?
It's kinda of worded like it will be a ban on OUR exports...
Is it also a ban on our IMPORTS?
........
............because it would apply only to exports.
I could missing something... but is this anything to be fearful of?
It's kinda of worded like it will be a ban on OUR exports...
Is it also a ban on our IMPORTS?
If a country can't export it, we sure as hell can't import it.
Stop trying to make it so simple......
How dare you bring logic into this.
So if Russia, Cina or the US want to ship arms to, I dunno, let's say Syria, or perhaps Mexico (F&F), will this get in the way? If so, who would sign it? If not, what good is it, except to prevent citizens from importing collector's items, such as m1's from SK?
"In Syria, we have seen the death toll rise well over 30,000, with weapons and ammunition pouring in the country for months now," he said. "We need a treaty that will set tough rules to control the arms trade, that will save lives and truly make the world a better place."
It's cool...they make CZs in the USA nowIf a country can't export it, we sure as hell can't import it.
Again AND ammo.
Say adieu to cheap ammo.
With Supreme Court nominees on the horizon, and Obama with nothing to lose, yea nothing to worry about here. Move along.